Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
D&I and Representation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EqualityNonNegotiable" data-source="post: 170192" data-attributes="member: 31762"><p>I agree that we should be able to have a civil debate regardless of differing opinions. Some subjects may be emotive but I believe it's an important skill for a lawyer to present their view in a logical manner.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, I have a few questions regarding your post. I'll start with the biggest one.</p><p></p><p><em>"In any case, there is still the question of why a VS demographic should be <strong><em>artificially</em></strong> made to represent a wider population."</em></p><p></p><p>Firstly, just to clarify, does your statement rely on the word 'artificially'?</p><p></p><p>If so, why would the VS demographic require an 'artificial' representation of the wider population? How do you define or measure artificial nature of this measurement?</p><p></p><p>To put it bluntly - are you suggesting that the percentage of the White British candidates who meet the firm's criteria is disproportionately higher than that of other ethnic groups?</p><p></p><p>Hypothetical simplified example - 50% White population 50% Other. White candidates 25% meet the criteria. Other 5% meet the criteria.</p><p></p><p>Is the example above somewhat representative of what you meant by artificial representation?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EqualityNonNegotiable, post: 170192, member: 31762"] I agree that we should be able to have a civil debate regardless of differing opinions. Some subjects may be emotive but I believe it's an important skill for a lawyer to present their view in a logical manner. Therefore, I have a few questions regarding your post. I'll start with the biggest one. [I]"In any case, there is still the question of why a VS demographic should be [B][I]artificially[/I][/B] made to represent a wider population."[/I] Firstly, just to clarify, does your statement rely on the word 'artificially'? If so, why would the VS demographic require an 'artificial' representation of the wider population? How do you define or measure artificial nature of this measurement? To put it bluntly - are you suggesting that the percentage of the White British candidates who meet the firm's criteria is disproportionately higher than that of other ethnic groups? Hypothetical simplified example - 50% White population 50% Other. White candidates 25% meet the criteria. Other 5% meet the criteria. Is the example above somewhat representative of what you meant by artificial representation? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
D&I and Representation
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…