Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Forum Home
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Wiki
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Reed Smith is live in the forum now
AMA
Live now
Graduate Recruitment and SQE interns from Reed Smith are here to answer your questions.
Join the live thread →
Willkie Live: How to Write a Successful Vacation Scheme Application
7 Oct 2025
5:30pm (UK)
Zoom (registration required)
Learn exactly how to write a successful application to Willkie Farr & Gallagher, with live examples + Q&A with
Gemma Baker
.
Register on Zoom →
Home
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
D&I and Representation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EqualityNonNegotiable" data-source="post: 172311" data-attributes="member: 31762"><p>I think with 70% female candidates, it would make sense for trainee cohorts to be split roughly 70-30. </p><p></p><p>However, gender split going 'the other way' would mean that let's say out of 30 male and 70 female trainees the 3 year PQE split could end up 28 male to 12 female. This would imply less than 15% retention of female lawyers.</p><p></p><p>Does that sound accurate? What do you think could be the reasons for such disparity?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EqualityNonNegotiable, post: 172311, member: 31762"] I think with 70% female candidates, it would make sense for trainee cohorts to be split roughly 70-30. However, gender split going 'the other way' would mean that let's say out of 30 male and 70 female trainees the 3 year PQE split could end up 28 male to 12 female. This would imply less than 15% retention of female lawyers. Does that sound accurate? What do you think could be the reasons for such disparity? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Home
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
D&I and Representation
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…