Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Definitive Guide to Assessed Negotiations! *Monday Article Series*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Booker" data-source="post: 49025" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>I have been plenty of sidebars in negotiation exercises. In some instructions you will be encouraged to think of way like this go get the matter concluded.</p><p></p><p>They aren't really assessing negotiation skills as it's not necessary for the job of a trainee and a skill that can be learnt/taught. They are assessing the skills required to be a good negotiator.</p><p></p><p>In the scenario where someone does something you haven't agreed, that will look badly on them, not you. If in the negotiation itself, then you will be assessed on the value/weight of your argument in relation to the case study. Obviously how you interject and disagree can influence your other competency scores, but if you have a valid point and present it, you won’t be perceived badly even if it contradicts your team mate, as ultimately this would be what someone would have to do in a professional setting if they felt someone was very much wrong on something and that the work could be put into jeopardy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Booker, post: 49025, member: 2672"] I have been plenty of sidebars in negotiation exercises. In some instructions you will be encouraged to think of way like this go get the matter concluded. They aren't really assessing negotiation skills as it's not necessary for the job of a trainee and a skill that can be learnt/taught. They are assessing the skills required to be a good negotiator. In the scenario where someone does something you haven't agreed, that will look badly on them, not you. If in the negotiation itself, then you will be assessed on the value/weight of your argument in relation to the case study. Obviously how you interject and disagree can influence your other competency scores, but if you have a valid point and present it, you won’t be perceived badly even if it contradicts your team mate, as ultimately this would be what someone would have to do in a professional setting if they felt someone was very much wrong on something and that the work could be put into jeopardy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Definitive Guide to Assessed Negotiations! *Monday Article Series*
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…