Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Definitive Guide to Assessed Negotiations! *Monday Article Series*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jacob Miller" data-source="post: 52480" data-attributes="member: 5063"><p>Hi [USER=948]@ZY[/USER], </p><p></p><p>I fundamentally agree with everything that Jessica has already stated. </p><p></p><p>It goes without saying that there will always be a lot of back-and-forth, especially on price, and you would never enter the negotiations (especially not with an anchoring point) at the particular price that is your actual target. It's impossible for me to say precisely whether £2m as opposed to, say, £1.75m or 2.25m or more is 'correct', unfortunately- the nature of negotiations is that, often, initial positions can be quite arbitrary and I would always say it's better to leave yourself a lot of wiggle room than too little. In my view, it would likely be looked on more poorly not to go in with this level of tact than to go in with a higher ask that is even more in your client's interests.</p><p>I would encourage you to look at all the different issues together, though, rather than in isolation. Consider, as the article discusses, whether there are other points that can be negotiated on in addition to the price. Consider different options for package offers, trade-offs etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jacob Miller, post: 52480, member: 5063"] Hi [USER=948]@ZY[/USER], I fundamentally agree with everything that Jessica has already stated. It goes without saying that there will always be a lot of back-and-forth, especially on price, and you would never enter the negotiations (especially not with an anchoring point) at the particular price that is your actual target. It's impossible for me to say precisely whether £2m as opposed to, say, £1.75m or 2.25m or more is 'correct', unfortunately- the nature of negotiations is that, often, initial positions can be quite arbitrary and I would always say it's better to leave yourself a lot of wiggle room than too little. In my view, it would likely be looked on more poorly not to go in with this level of tact than to go in with a higher ask that is even more in your client's interests. I would encourage you to look at all the different issues together, though, rather than in isolation. Consider, as the article discusses, whether there are other points that can be negotiated on in addition to the price. Consider different options for package offers, trade-offs etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Definitive Guide to Assessed Negotiations! *Monday Article Series*
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…