Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Interviews Discussion
Demonstrating motivation for commercial law at interview
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jon" data-source="post: 56243" data-attributes="member: 7075"><p>True, commercial barristers do also need to take their clients' business interests/perspectives into consideration, so you'd have to draw a clearer distinction.</p><p></p><p>You could distinguish between the two by focusing on the work they actually do. Do you prefer managing the case, gathering evidence, more investigative/fact-finding work, putting the case together? Or do you prefer oral advocacy*, appearing in court and presenting the legal arguments, and giving expert advice on complicated bits of law? Solicitors will be involved with the case right from the start and will have a longer-term relationship with the client. It will be the solicitor and not the client who instructs the barrister. Your point about teamwork is also valid.</p><p></p><p>But also remember that this really only applies to disputes/contentious work. If you prefer transactional work, then it should be quite easy to answer...!</p><p></p><p>(*solicitors can obtain rights of audience in higher courts and are increasingly providing advocacy, but the distinctions are still valid.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jon, post: 56243, member: 7075"] True, commercial barristers do also need to take their clients' business interests/perspectives into consideration, so you'd have to draw a clearer distinction. You could distinguish between the two by focusing on the work they actually do. Do you prefer managing the case, gathering evidence, more investigative/fact-finding work, putting the case together? Or do you prefer oral advocacy*, appearing in court and presenting the legal arguments, and giving expert advice on complicated bits of law? Solicitors will be involved with the case right from the start and will have a longer-term relationship with the client. It will be the solicitor and not the client who instructs the barrister. Your point about teamwork is also valid. But also remember that this really only applies to disputes/contentious work. If you prefer transactional work, then it should be quite easy to answer...! (*solicitors can obtain rights of audience in higher courts and are increasingly providing advocacy, but the distinctions are still valid.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Interviews Discussion
Demonstrating motivation for commercial law at interview
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…