Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Feedback on Skadden VC application
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lulu95049" data-source="post: 228869" data-attributes="member: 26215"><p>Hi Blipken,</p><p></p><p>Your answer is good but there are a few changes you could make to tighten it up and improve your application as a whole.</p><p></p><p><u>Paragraphs 1+2 </u></p><p></p><p>Overall your structure is good - you've identified the characteristic of the law firm that appeals to you (eg. the firm's challenger mindset), and you've linked this to your own experience. You should combine the first two paragraphs into one, and focus on making it less wordy and more punchy. This is definitely an art, and something that you may want to use AI to help with. Instead of giving two examples to link the firm's challenger mindset to your own experience (ie. you adapting to a new education system at 14, and you taking on trainee-level legal work experience), maybe just stick to one example, and flesh it out a bit more.</p><p></p><p><u>Paragraph 3</u></p><p></p><p>Again your structure here is good. You say that you took finance, PE and M&A modules at university, and because of that, you realised you would enjoy transactional work - but why? What specifically did you enjoy about those modules? You need to go one step further in your self-reflection here. In the same paragraph, you then go on to talk about Skadden's approach to innovation. This seems a bit random, and should ideally be a whole other paragraph in itself. I know that word limits can be restrictive in applications, so it may be better to stick to two firm 'characteristics' and link both to your personal experience, but do so in detail.</p><p></p><p></p><p>NB. for the '£1trn in deal value in 2015' point, is this definitely in GBP, and not USD? (remembering Skadden is a US firm). Taking the exchange rate into account, this is obviously a big difference and is exactly the kind of point that the graduate recruitment team will pick up on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lulu95049, post: 228869, member: 26215"] Hi Blipken, Your answer is good but there are a few changes you could make to tighten it up and improve your application as a whole. [U]Paragraphs 1+2 [/U] Overall your structure is good - you've identified the characteristic of the law firm that appeals to you (eg. the firm's challenger mindset), and you've linked this to your own experience. You should combine the first two paragraphs into one, and focus on making it less wordy and more punchy. This is definitely an art, and something that you may want to use AI to help with. Instead of giving two examples to link the firm's challenger mindset to your own experience (ie. you adapting to a new education system at 14, and you taking on trainee-level legal work experience), maybe just stick to one example, and flesh it out a bit more. [U]Paragraph 3[/U] Again your structure here is good. You say that you took finance, PE and M&A modules at university, and because of that, you realised you would enjoy transactional work - but why? What specifically did you enjoy about those modules? You need to go one step further in your self-reflection here. In the same paragraph, you then go on to talk about Skadden's approach to innovation. This seems a bit random, and should ideally be a whole other paragraph in itself. I know that word limits can be restrictive in applications, so it may be better to stick to two firm 'characteristics' and link both to your personal experience, but do so in detail. NB. for the '£1trn in deal value in 2015' point, is this definitely in GBP, and not USD? (remembering Skadden is a US firm). Taking the exchange rate into account, this is obviously a big difference and is exactly the kind of point that the graduate recruitment team will pick up on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Feedback on Skadden VC application
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…