Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Feedback on Skadden VC application
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="blipken" data-source="post: 229111" data-attributes="member: 42101"><p>Thanks [USER=43467]@S1kumo[/USER] for stopping by and offering your opinion, much appreciated. See, the background to my drafting here was that I'd heard from Grad Rec (not Skadden, but a different firm) that they want to see more about <em>you</em> as opposed to <em>why the firm</em>. So I leaned quite heavily into who I am for this answer. That may have been at the cost of sounding superficial when talking about Skadden.</p><p></p><p>I guess sounding superficial may be a general shortcoming of my applications - I have trouble being really specific when I outline my motivation. I actually thought this answer was one of the better ones because I tried to connect several points to sound more unique: in para. 2, I talk about strength in FinTech M&A against the background of a broad transactional practice. I thought this was as specific as I could get without going into so much detail that Grad Rec may get turned off, like e.g. the fact that it was SPAC mergers. Do you have any advice on how to find that middle ground?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="blipken, post: 229111, member: 42101"] Thanks [USER=43467]@S1kumo[/USER] for stopping by and offering your opinion, much appreciated. See, the background to my drafting here was that I'd heard from Grad Rec (not Skadden, but a different firm) that they want to see more about [I]you[/I] as opposed to [I]why the firm[/I]. So I leaned quite heavily into who I am for this answer. That may have been at the cost of sounding superficial when talking about Skadden. I guess sounding superficial may be a general shortcoming of my applications - I have trouble being really specific when I outline my motivation. I actually thought this answer was one of the better ones because I tried to connect several points to sound more unique: in para. 2, I talk about strength in FinTech M&A against the background of a broad transactional practice. I thought this was as specific as I could get without going into so much detail that Grad Rec may get turned off, like e.g. the fact that it was SPAC mergers. Do you have any advice on how to find that middle ground? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Feedback on Skadden VC application
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…