Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Vacation Schemes Discussion
Firms That Still Accept Trainees via Direct TC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaysen" data-source="post: 4385" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>Interesting point. I definitely think it would be helpful if we had a clearer idea of how many trainees a firm tends to recruit from vac schemes v direct training contract applications. The last investigation is a little outdated now and doesn't cover all firms: (2014) <a href="https://www.thelawyer.com/which-firms-take-most-and-fewest-trainees-from-vac-schemes/" target="_blank">https://www.thelawyer.com/which-firms-take-most-and-fewest-trainees-from-vac-schemes/</a>. Unfortunately, I doubt law firms will release this information to us.</p><p></p><p>As far as I'm aware, the same types of firms are still recruiting from direct training contract applications. It has always been more difficult, but if you are competent you should have a good chance. It's also the case that some firms have good and bad vac scheme round, which influences the number of applicants that take from direct TC's. This is of course excluding the US firms and others that explicitly state they take all/a majority from vac schemes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaysen, post: 4385, member: 1"] Interesting point. I definitely think it would be helpful if we had a clearer idea of how many trainees a firm tends to recruit from vac schemes v direct training contract applications. The last investigation is a little outdated now and doesn't cover all firms: (2014) [URL]https://www.thelawyer.com/which-firms-take-most-and-fewest-trainees-from-vac-schemes/[/URL]. Unfortunately, I doubt law firms will release this information to us. As far as I'm aware, the same types of firms are still recruiting from direct training contract applications. It has always been more difficult, but if you are competent you should have a good chance. It's also the case that some firms have good and bad vac scheme round, which influences the number of applicants that take from direct TC's. This is of course excluding the US firms and others that explicitly state they take all/a majority from vac schemes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Vacation Schemes Discussion
Firms That Still Accept Trainees via Direct TC
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…