TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Amma Usman" data-source="post: 217329" data-attributes="member: 36740">Hi TCLA Community!Due to popular demand, a thread has been created which outlines the firms that do not require situational judgment tests (SJTs) and the Watson Glaser test in their application process.As always, do let us know if there are any suggestions for improvement, or anything we could add to the information below.We hope you find this useful, and best wishes with all your applications this cycle! We are very much rooting for you all!<h2 style="text-align: center"></h2><h2 style="text-align: center">Firms Without The Watson Glaser</h2> <table style='width: 100%'><tr><td>A&O Shearman (SJT-like online experience instead) </td></tr><tr><td>Arnold & Porter </td></tr><tr><td>Covington & Burling </td></tr><tr><td>Davis Polk </td></tr><tr><td>Debevoise & Plimpton </td></tr><tr><td>Dechert </td></tr><tr><td>Freshfields (website description seems to mirror SJT-like assessments, though previously a WG existed) </td></tr><tr><td>Goodwin </td></tr><tr><td>Greenberg Traurig </td></tr><tr><td>Haynes & Boone </td></tr><tr><td>HSF Kramer </td></tr><tr><td>Jones Day </td></tr><tr><td>King & Spalding </td></tr><tr><td>Ashurst (seems to be strength-based, unlike previous cycles’ games-based assessments) </td></tr><tr><td>Latham & Watkins </td></tr><tr><td>Mayer Brown (website mentions “behavioural, numerical, verbal reasoning questions” instead) </td></tr><tr><td>Morgan Lewis </td></tr><tr><td>Morrison Foerster </td></tr><tr><td>Orrick </td></tr><tr><td>Paul Hastings </td></tr><tr><td>Paul, Weiss </td></tr><tr><td>Reed Smith (SJT-like test instead) </td></tr><tr><td>Sidley Austin </td></tr><tr><td>Skadden </td></tr><tr><td>Weil </td></tr><tr><td>White & Case </td></tr><tr><td>Willkie </td></tr></table> <h2 style="text-align: center"></h2><h2 style="text-align: center">Firms Without SJT’s</h2> <table style='width: 100%'><tr><td>Arnold & Porter </td></tr><tr><td>Cleary (Watson Glaser instead) </td></tr><tr><td>Clifford Chance (Watson Glaser instead) </td></tr><tr><td>Cooley (“online appraisal designed to assess your critical thinking skills” has been interpreted from firm’s brochure as Watson Glaser instead) </td></tr><tr><td>Covington & Burling </td></tr><tr><td>Davis Polk </td></tr><tr><td>Debevoise & Plimpton </td></tr><tr><td>Dechert </td></tr><tr><td>DLA Piper (Watson Glaser instead) </td></tr><tr><td>Goodwin </td></tr><tr><td>Greenberg Traurig </td></tr><tr><td>Haynes & Boone </td></tr><tr><td>Hogan Lovells (“critical thinking test” is interpreted from firm’s website as Watson Glaser instead) </td></tr><tr><td>Jones Day </td></tr><tr><td>K&L Gates (“group exercise, a swift analysis test, critical reasoning test and a written test” instead) </td></tr><tr><td>King & Spalding </td></tr><tr><td>Morgan Lewis </td></tr><tr><td>Morrison Foerster </td></tr><tr><td>Orrick </td></tr><tr><td>Paul Hastings </td></tr><tr><td>Paul, Weiss </td></tr><tr><td>Sidley Austin </td></tr><tr><td>Skadden </td></tr><tr><td>Weil </td></tr><tr><td>Willkie </td></tr></table> </blockquote>

Verification: Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Top Bottom

Search

Search

Reply to thread