Hi [USER=27802]@pinkpineapple[/USER], this is a great answer. Here is my feedback.
What you did well:
- I was impressed that you mentioned the development of Baidu's AI chatbot called Ernie. This original answer highlights your sound commercial awareness as well as your knowledge of the development of AI bots an international scale - such international commercial awareness can be amazing to highlight to law firms given your need as a commercial solicitor to examine commercial trends on an international level.
- I liked how you took [USER=13128]@ALYH[/USER]'s point regarding customer service and build on this idea to highlight how ChatGPT can provide a more seamless, cost-efficient service - this was excellently done and demonstrates your ability in a group discussion to not simply agree with people's ideas but also take them further and build on them by adding your own slant.
- I also liked how you were precise about the actual way in which firms involved in the technology sector may be able to assist clients.
To improve:
- Can you perhaps expand on how Ernie might differentiate itself from ChatGPT? This could also be a good opportunity to draw on any knowledge you might have of the US-China trade war or the Chinese market at large.
- You mentioned Allen & Overy's use of AI chatbot Harvey but you could have tied this back to [USER=13128]@ALYH[/USER]'s previous mention of Harvey. It is important to acknowledge when others have previously mentioned a point to highlight your active listening to others and how you are not simply focused on presenting your points, but are also taking into account others' contributions. Simply mentioning 'As mentioned by ALYH' or 'As ALYH flagged' would be a short yet effective way of signposting your active listening.
- Some sections of your answer could have been more detailed. For instance, when mentioning that ChatGPT can help to reduce costs when seeking financial and business advice, what kind of advice are you referring to here? I feel this is an interesting point that would merit further elaboration.
- You mention insurance may benefit from this trend - how so?
- You mention that practice areas relating to supply chains and logistics might benefit from this trend. In my opinion, what you are inferring here is more a sector-focused approach. At a sector focused firm, we might then look at how supply chains and logistics matters can be solved across a range of practice areas. It is unclear otherwise what you mean by practice areas relating to supply chains and logistics (many practice areas could be related to supply chains or logistics in some form). I think providing examples of practice areas that may deal with supply chains and logistics matters would clarity to your answer.