Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
General Firm Research
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J88" data-source="post: 5590" data-attributes="member: 655"><p>With regards to Travers Smith, some standout points are that they have a small intake size, esp. for a silver circle firm; they are a leader in mid market private equity deals, with notable repeat clients (e.g. Bridgepoint); and they also have a unique ‘room sharing’ structure, where partners sit with trainees (and associates) in one room. The firm therefore has a very flat structure.</p><p></p><p>Just a general point: maybe it’d be helpful to think of uniqueness not in terms of one feature, but the aggregate of the firm’s qualities. Yeah, TS’ international structure might not be entirely unique, because Slaughter and May also have no international offices - but when you combine TS’ international strategy with who their clients are, their intake size, their sector strength, and add all these other things, then the firm does start to look quite unique I think</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J88, post: 5590, member: 655"] With regards to Travers Smith, some standout points are that they have a small intake size, esp. for a silver circle firm; they are a leader in mid market private equity deals, with notable repeat clients (e.g. Bridgepoint); and they also have a unique ‘room sharing’ structure, where partners sit with trainees (and associates) in one room. The firm therefore has a very flat structure. Just a general point: maybe it’d be helpful to think of uniqueness not in terms of one feature, but the aggregate of the firm’s qualities. Yeah, TS’ international structure might not be entirely unique, because Slaughter and May also have no international offices - but when you combine TS’ international strategy with who their clients are, their intake size, their sector strength, and add all these other things, then the firm does start to look quite unique I think [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
General Firm Research
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…