Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Greenshoe options - Aramco
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andreasyau1" data-source="post: 16706" data-attributes="member: 600"><p>The goal of the underwriters is to sell the shares as close to the offer price as possible and avoid price volatility for the issuing company. Let's say that (x) = size of the share offering.</p><p></p><p>Underwriters are allowed to sell an additional allocation (y) of the offering size. If they see that investor demand is high, they will sell (x + y) to the market. Because the underwriters do not have y, they are shorting the stock and would need to cover their short positions.</p><p></p><p>Scenario A: share price trades above the offer price because the demand > supply. Underwriters would want to bring the price down to the offer price. Therefore, they exercise the Greenshoe option, which is to buy 15% more shares at the offer price from the issuing company. By selling this 15%, they can prop up supply in the market and bring the price down and 'stabilize' it.</p><p></p><p>Scenario B: share price trades below offer price because the demand < supply. Underwriters would NOT exercise the Greenshoe option. Rather, they would buy back (y) from the market to decrease the supply of shares relative to the demand. This would bring the price back up and 'stabilize it'.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andreasyau1, post: 16706, member: 600"] The goal of the underwriters is to sell the shares as close to the offer price as possible and avoid price volatility for the issuing company. Let's say that (x) = size of the share offering. Underwriters are allowed to sell an additional allocation (y) of the offering size. If they see that investor demand is high, they will sell (x + y) to the market. Because the underwriters do not have y, they are shorting the stock and would need to cover their short positions. Scenario A: share price trades above the offer price because the demand > supply. Underwriters would want to bring the price down to the offer price. Therefore, they exercise the Greenshoe option, which is to buy 15% more shares at the offer price from the issuing company. By selling this 15%, they can prop up supply in the market and bring the price down and 'stabilize' it. Scenario B: share price trades below offer price because the demand < supply. Underwriters would NOT exercise the Greenshoe option. Rather, they would buy back (y) from the market to decrease the supply of shares relative to the demand. This would bring the price back up and 'stabilize it'. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Greenshoe options - Aramco
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…