Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
help with this please
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kalum patel" data-source="post: 78724" data-attributes="member: 12642"><p>hello im an indian studnent struggling with this question any help its regarding uk law thanks</p><p>Which of the following below regarding the legal and evidential burdens is the most correct? </p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">1-If there is an evidential burden on the defence due to a specific defence being raised (such as alibi) then the prosecution will have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that both the alibi is untrue, and that the defendant committed the offence charged.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">2-Where the legal burden is the prosecution’s alone the evidential burden is also solely on the prosecution.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">3-Where the legal burden is on the prosecution there is also an evidential burden on the prosecution, however, there might be an evidential burden on the defendant if a specific defence (such as alibi) is raised and then the defendant needs to prove the defence.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">4-If there is an evidential burden on the defence due to a specific defence being raised (such as alibi) then the prosecution will have to prove on the balance of probabilities that the alibi is untrue, and beyond a reasonable doubt that that the defendant committed the offence charged.</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kalum patel, post: 78724, member: 12642"] hello im an indian studnent struggling with this question any help its regarding uk law thanks Which of the following below regarding the legal and evidential burdens is the most correct? [LIST] [*]1-If there is an evidential burden on the defence due to a specific defence being raised (such as alibi) then the prosecution will have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that both the alibi is untrue, and that the defendant committed the offence charged. [*]2-Where the legal burden is the prosecution’s alone the evidential burden is also solely on the prosecution. [*]3-Where the legal burden is on the prosecution there is also an evidential burden on the prosecution, however, there might be an evidential burden on the defendant if a specific defence (such as alibi) is raised and then the defendant needs to prove the defence. [*]4-If there is an evidential burden on the defence due to a specific defence being raised (such as alibi) then the prosecution will have to prove on the balance of probabilities that the alibi is untrue, and beyond a reasonable doubt that that the defendant committed the offence charged. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
help with this please
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…