Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
I am an Associate at a Global Law Firm. Ask me Anything!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LM" data-source="post: 48109" data-attributes="member: 9535"><p>Thanks, [USER=1160]@Alice G[/USER] for the great question! To simply label an advisory seat as just "research-heavy" would be to do these departments a disservice. For example, during my time in the Antitrust department, I shared my time between assisting with merger filings (a task that is naturally more "transactional" due to its importance to a deal's overall structure) and assisting with Article 101 infringements (a more research-focused task). I would say that most advisory seats have a transactional arm to their practice that you will be involved in, so really, I don't think you ever get away from that type of work. However, that being said, the amount of time that is spent on transactional work, is one of the key differentiators. During my time in the Corporate department, I can't remember the last time I conducted a piece of legal research. Conversely, in an advisory department, there is a greater variety of work and more scope to conduct legal research into particular areas. I want to take this opportunity to also highlight how these differences play out when it comes to a particular M&A transaction. In the Corporate department, you will be drafting the transaction documentation (e.g., the SPA) and negotiating with the other side. As a member of the advisory team, you will be conducting due diligence into a particular area of the Target business and feeding your input back to the Corporate team.</p><p></p><p>In terms of the skills required, most of the skills needed are not unique to a transactional or advisory seat. The skills you need for both are: high levels of attention to detail; dedication; lateral and commercial thinking; and an ability to effectively communicate with others. The main difference, I found, between a transactional and advisory seat was the ability to conduct quality legal research. You need to be able to find a particular point of law and summarize this succinctly.</p><p></p><p>Hope this helps!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LM, post: 48109, member: 9535"] Thanks, [USER=1160]@Alice G[/USER] for the great question! To simply label an advisory seat as just "research-heavy" would be to do these departments a disservice. For example, during my time in the Antitrust department, I shared my time between assisting with merger filings (a task that is naturally more "transactional" due to its importance to a deal's overall structure) and assisting with Article 101 infringements (a more research-focused task). I would say that most advisory seats have a transactional arm to their practice that you will be involved in, so really, I don't think you ever get away from that type of work. However, that being said, the amount of time that is spent on transactional work, is one of the key differentiators. During my time in the Corporate department, I can't remember the last time I conducted a piece of legal research. Conversely, in an advisory department, there is a greater variety of work and more scope to conduct legal research into particular areas. I want to take this opportunity to also highlight how these differences play out when it comes to a particular M&A transaction. In the Corporate department, you will be drafting the transaction documentation (e.g., the SPA) and negotiating with the other side. As a member of the advisory team, you will be conducting due diligence into a particular area of the Target business and feeding your input back to the Corporate team. In terms of the skills required, most of the skills needed are not unique to a transactional or advisory seat. The skills you need for both are: high levels of attention to detail; dedication; lateral and commercial thinking; and an ability to effectively communicate with others. The main difference, I found, between a transactional and advisory seat was the ability to conduct quality legal research. You need to be able to find a particular point of law and summarize this succinctly. Hope this helps! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
I am an Associate at a Global Law Firm. Ask me Anything!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…