Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Interviews Discussion
Interview Question Help:
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dheepa" data-source="post: 47278" data-attributes="member: 1572"><p>I think you're already on the right track in thinking the STAR structure would work best. I would still start out by saying what exactly my actions would be in that given scenario, so if I'd talk to supervisors, get additional help that kind of thing. I would then try to maybe relate the actions I've mentioned I would take to a similar situation I'd encountered. </p><p></p><p>So if the question was the one in OP's post, I would start by stating all the points I've already mentioned in my first reply and then say "For example, when I was X in Y society, I had to deliver a final report by Z date however had a prior commitment to an event I had already agreed to organise on behalf of a different society" and then elaborate on how my actions helped me resolve the conflict and hence why I'd use a similar approach as a trainee.</p><p></p><p>I think another extra element you could add to the STAR approach is an additional Reflection point (think STARR instead of STAR). This involves adding what you think could have gone better in your example and how you could apply that to the hypothetical scenario for a slightly more efficient/desirable outcome. This is not necessary but I think it really shows your interviewers that you have the ability to reflect and improve.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dheepa, post: 47278, member: 1572"] I think you're already on the right track in thinking the STAR structure would work best. I would still start out by saying what exactly my actions would be in that given scenario, so if I'd talk to supervisors, get additional help that kind of thing. I would then try to maybe relate the actions I've mentioned I would take to a similar situation I'd encountered. So if the question was the one in OP's post, I would start by stating all the points I've already mentioned in my first reply and then say "For example, when I was X in Y society, I had to deliver a final report by Z date however had a prior commitment to an event I had already agreed to organise on behalf of a different society" and then elaborate on how my actions helped me resolve the conflict and hence why I'd use a similar approach as a trainee. I think another extra element you could add to the STAR approach is an additional Reflection point (think STARR instead of STAR). This involves adding what you think could have gone better in your example and how you could apply that to the hypothetical scenario for a slightly more efficient/desirable outcome. This is not necessary but I think it really shows your interviewers that you have the ability to reflect and improve. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Interviews Discussion
Interview Question Help:
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…