Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Law firm or in-house training contract?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daniele" data-source="post: 92756" data-attributes="member: 3920"><p>Hi everyone,</p><p></p><p>I would like to know your opinion about training in private practice vs in-house. I have worked in-house for a few years as a paralegal and I now have a chance to train in a venture capital firm in London. It would be a lot of specialized private equity/asset management work. I love this field since you get to work directly with start-ups and entrepreneurs, but I am wondering if this would be the right decision to make considering I would not explore different areas as it happens with the different seats in a law firm. On the upside, the quality of training would be incredible since I would be working directly with the Chief legal officer, who previously was a senior associate at Allen & Overy (private equity), and another Legal counsel previously also working in a law firm. The way venture capital firms are structured would also mean quality work on deals in a similar fashion to that in private practice. The only doubt I have is that I wouldn't explore different areas so I would be probably "stuck" in this sector going forward. In addition to that, it might be harder to move to private practice as an associate later on. Any ideas?</p><p></p><p>Thank you all in advance.</p><p></p><p>Daniele</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daniele, post: 92756, member: 3920"] Hi everyone, I would like to know your opinion about training in private practice vs in-house. I have worked in-house for a few years as a paralegal and I now have a chance to train in a venture capital firm in London. It would be a lot of specialized private equity/asset management work. I love this field since you get to work directly with start-ups and entrepreneurs, but I am wondering if this would be the right decision to make considering I would not explore different areas as it happens with the different seats in a law firm. On the upside, the quality of training would be incredible since I would be working directly with the Chief legal officer, who previously was a senior associate at Allen & Overy (private equity), and another Legal counsel previously also working in a law firm. The way venture capital firms are structured would also mean quality work on deals in a similar fashion to that in private practice. The only doubt I have is that I wouldn't explore different areas so I would be probably "stuck" in this sector going forward. In addition to that, it might be harder to move to private practice as an associate later on. Any ideas? Thank you all in advance. Daniele [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Law firm or in-house training contract?
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…