Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Law firms moving all candidates to SQE in next in-take despite those done LPC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="andrecsaa" data-source="post: 193692" data-attributes="member: 26634"><p>Thank you! I agree that it doesn’t make sense to sit the exam for which the regulator has exempted you.</p><p></p><p>I am eligible for an exemption from SQE2 due to my experience as a qualified lawyer in one of the few jurisdictions recognised by the SRA. However, I was afraid that applying for this exemption before securing a TC might prevent me from participating in VS and TC. I read here that someone who was exempted from SQE2 applied for it, then passed SQE1 and qualified as a solicitor, but the person was no longer eligible to participate in the TC and could not get any NQ position. Worst position ever.</p><p></p><p>Many firms state that they do not accept qualified lawyers for TC (most US firms like Debevoise and Ropes & Gray), and Freshfields accepts qualified lawyers until 4 PQE. But none says anything about SQE exemptions. I believe it would be a case-by-case analysis, and the best is to ask grad rec.</p><p></p><p>I will wait until I secure a TC and then discuss with grad rec the option of taking the full course but sitting only for SQE1 and applying for the SQE2 exemption.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="andrecsaa, post: 193692, member: 26634"] Thank you! I agree that it doesn’t make sense to sit the exam for which the regulator has exempted you. I am eligible for an exemption from SQE2 due to my experience as a qualified lawyer in one of the few jurisdictions recognised by the SRA. However, I was afraid that applying for this exemption before securing a TC might prevent me from participating in VS and TC. I read here that someone who was exempted from SQE2 applied for it, then passed SQE1 and qualified as a solicitor, but the person was no longer eligible to participate in the TC and could not get any NQ position. Worst position ever. Many firms state that they do not accept qualified lawyers for TC (most US firms like Debevoise and Ropes & Gray), and Freshfields accepts qualified lawyers until 4 PQE. But none says anything about SQE exemptions. I believe it would be a case-by-case analysis, and the best is to ask grad rec. I will wait until I secure a TC and then discuss with grad rec the option of taking the full course but sitting only for SQE1 and applying for the SQE2 exemption. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
General Discussion
Law firms moving all candidates to SQE in next in-take despite those done LPC
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…