Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Legal News Updates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaysen" data-source="post: 12648" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>Great article from the WSJ yesterday: <strong><a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/being-a-law-firm-partner-was-once-a-job-for-life-that-culture-is-all-but-dead-11565362437" target="_blank">Being a Law Firm Partner Was Once a Job for Life. That Culture Is All but Dead</a>. </strong></p><p> </p><p>A quick summary for those without access:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The article begins highlighting the huge difference between Kirkland's equity partners and salaried partners (the former earning between $1.75m to $15m while salaried partners 'can expect to make $800,000 at most').</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This ties in with how law firms have changed: partners used to have job security, fairly equal pay and rarely jumped between different law firms.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Now, according to the article, 'law firms are now often partnerships in name only'; lawyers are expendable and partners regularly move to rivals for money - bringing their clients with them.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Law firms have also changed in the way they've grown: many have pursued aggressive expansion, becoming one-stop shops by providing a variety of services to clients.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">With increasing profits at the top, 'lawyers further down the ladder are sometimes getting left behind', according to the article. This references the longer path to partnership at firms, as well as positions like counsel and salaried partner, which act as further stepping stones.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Again Kirkland is mentioned as junior partners fight for a few small equity partner places each year, while billing over 2,500 hours and sometimes working 80-hour weeks.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Some firms still use the lockstep compensation system (where partners are paid according to seniority), such as Cleary Gottlieb and Cravath, although this model can make it harder to keep star partners who might be attracted by the higher pay at rival firms using more of a merit-based compensation system.</li> </ul><p>Comment:</p><p></p><p>This is a great topic if you're looking for material on some of the challenges facing law firms. Working out how to retain talented lawyers is a real challenge, especially recently with US firms like Kirkland and Latham poaching partners in London. Some firms - like much of the magic circle - have tried to respond by modifying their lockstep, so they have the flexibility to pay more for the best partners, although they need to be careful of alienating existing partners at the firm. For firms like Kirkland, they might be able to attract very talented partners, but the question is how this has affected their culture and how committed to the firm these partners are.</p><p></p><p>For you guys, I think it's an important factor to consider. Obviously money is a big motivator when you're looking to apply to commercial law firms, but you might also want to consider other factors that may impact your experience at a firm.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaysen, post: 12648, member: 1"] Great article from the WSJ yesterday: [B][URL='https://www.wsj.com/articles/being-a-law-firm-partner-was-once-a-job-for-life-that-culture-is-all-but-dead-11565362437']Being a Law Firm Partner Was Once a Job for Life. That Culture Is All but Dead[/URL]. [/B] A quick summary for those without access: [LIST] [*]The article begins highlighting the huge difference between Kirkland's equity partners and salaried partners (the former earning between $1.75m to $15m while salaried partners 'can expect to make $800,000 at most'). [/LIST] [LIST] [*]This ties in with how law firms have changed: partners used to have job security, fairly equal pay and rarely jumped between different law firms. [/LIST] [LIST] [*]Now, according to the article, 'law firms are now often partnerships in name only'; lawyers are expendable and partners regularly move to rivals for money - bringing their clients with them. [/LIST] [LIST] [*]Law firms have also changed in the way they've grown: many have pursued aggressive expansion, becoming one-stop shops by providing a variety of services to clients. [/LIST] [LIST] [*]With increasing profits at the top, 'lawyers further down the ladder are sometimes getting left behind', according to the article. This references the longer path to partnership at firms, as well as positions like counsel and salaried partner, which act as further stepping stones. [/LIST] [LIST] [*]Again Kirkland is mentioned as junior partners fight for a few small equity partner places each year, while billing over 2,500 hours and sometimes working 80-hour weeks. [/LIST] [LIST] [*]Some firms still use the lockstep compensation system (where partners are paid according to seniority), such as Cleary Gottlieb and Cravath, although this model can make it harder to keep star partners who might be attracted by the higher pay at rival firms using more of a merit-based compensation system. [/LIST] Comment: This is a great topic if you're looking for material on some of the challenges facing law firms. Working out how to retain talented lawyers is a real challenge, especially recently with US firms like Kirkland and Latham poaching partners in London. Some firms - like much of the magic circle - have tried to respond by modifying their lockstep, so they have the flexibility to pay more for the best partners, although they need to be careful of alienating existing partners at the firm. For firms like Kirkland, they might be able to attract very talented partners, but the question is how this has affected their culture and how committed to the firm these partners are. For you guys, I think it's an important factor to consider. Obviously money is a big motivator when you're looking to apply to commercial law firms, but you might also want to consider other factors that may impact your experience at a firm. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Legal News Updates
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…