Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Hey Guest,
Have an interview coming up?
We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week.
Book here
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) Forum
LPC and SQE 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="j.s.cox" data-source="post: 195914" data-attributes="member: 20454"><p>There is a lot of memorising the law but in a different way to SQE1. On the SRA website, under the SQE2 specification, you can find the following drop-down lists at the bottom of the page:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]6604[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>If you open Annex 1, it tells you the specific FLK required for SQE2:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]6605[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This is terribly formatted, so I put it all into a checklist to ensure I had covered everything. Depending on the type of FLK required, I would either:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Memorise the key elements of the FLK only (e.g. the mens rea and actus reus for s.1 Thef Act 1968 without revising any case law);</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Ensure I could talk about at least three points relating to that piece of FLK (e.g. three key points relating to rent and rent review); or</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Ensure I had a detailed understanding that piece of FLK (e.g. all the steps and exemptions in an inheritance tax calculation).</li> </ol><p></p><p>To decide which category the knowledge fell into, I thought about the likely questions they could ask considering that any advice we needed to provide would likely be to a client and there is only a limited amount of time for you to answer questions. You should also think about which papers that area of FLK is likely to come up in and think about how you would tailor your answers (e.g. summary judgment in an advocacy exam v legal writing v case and matter analysis v legal drafting). </p><p></p><p>For me, the key to my success was ensuring that I knew enough about each area of FLK to at least try and answer any question that came up. I know that some people strategically didn't revise some areas of law for SQE1 (e.g. tax), but (without breaking the NDA) that ended up being a catastrophic move in SQE2 when a whole paper came up that people had not revised at all. You can't try to answer a question when you know nothing about the topic!</p><p></p><p>The best thing about the SQE2 for me was that you did not need to know as many areas of law as SQE1, but I still think it was a significant amount to revise and I found it just as challenging to prepare for as SQE1. That said, I managed to pass in the 1st quintile, so I reckon my revision techniques worked quite well!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="j.s.cox, post: 195914, member: 20454"] There is a lot of memorising the law but in a different way to SQE1. On the SRA website, under the SQE2 specification, you can find the following drop-down lists at the bottom of the page: [ATTACH type="full"]6604[/ATTACH] If you open Annex 1, it tells you the specific FLK required for SQE2: [ATTACH type="full"]6605[/ATTACH] This is terribly formatted, so I put it all into a checklist to ensure I had covered everything. Depending on the type of FLK required, I would either: [LIST=1] [*]Memorise the key elements of the FLK only (e.g. the mens rea and actus reus for s.1 Thef Act 1968 without revising any case law); [*]Ensure I could talk about at least three points relating to that piece of FLK (e.g. three key points relating to rent and rent review); or [*]Ensure I had a detailed understanding that piece of FLK (e.g. all the steps and exemptions in an inheritance tax calculation). [/LIST] To decide which category the knowledge fell into, I thought about the likely questions they could ask considering that any advice we needed to provide would likely be to a client and there is only a limited amount of time for you to answer questions. You should also think about which papers that area of FLK is likely to come up in and think about how you would tailor your answers (e.g. summary judgment in an advocacy exam v legal writing v case and matter analysis v legal drafting). For me, the key to my success was ensuring that I knew enough about each area of FLK to at least try and answer any question that came up. I know that some people strategically didn't revise some areas of law for SQE1 (e.g. tax), but (without breaking the NDA) that ended up being a catastrophic move in SQE2 when a whole paper came up that people had not revised at all. You can't try to answer a question when you know nothing about the topic! The best thing about the SQE2 for me was that you did not need to know as many areas of law as SQE1, but I still think it was a significant amount to revise and I found it just as challenging to prepare for as SQE1. That said, I managed to pass in the 1st quintile, so I reckon my revision techniques worked quite well! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) Forum
LPC and SQE 2
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…