Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Resources and Materials
Interview Experiences 2021 - 2022
Macfarlanes Interview 2021
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaysen" data-source="post: 97875" data-attributes="member: 1"><p><strong>Please state the month/year you interviewed at the firm.</strong></p><p></p><p>September 2021</p><p></p><p><strong>Please specify what the interview was for.</strong></p><p></p><p>Training contract commencing 2023</p><p></p><p><strong>Please give an overview of the day with approximate timings.</strong></p><p></p><p>These are very approximate as I can't quite remember the timings -- everything passed in such a blur.</p><p></p><p>9am: Arrive</p><p></p><p>9:15am: Partner interview</p><p></p><p>10:15am: Written exercise</p><p></p><p>11:45am: In-tray exercise</p><p></p><p>2pm: finish</p><p></p><p><strong>Please provide a summary of each assessment on the day with approximate timings.</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The partner interview was with a single grad recruitment partner. There were no people from HR present at this interview. While the interview was in the standard competency interview format, my interviewer allowed me the space to build a rapport so I wasn’t confined solely to answering questions in a STAR format, although that was certainly required.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The written exercise took the form of writing a letter to a client and a supervisor on a commercial issue relating to [redacted] advertising.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The in-tray exercise took the form of three separate commercial and ethical issues based on previous cases and situations that the firm had handled in the past. I had to fillet the information in it, come up with a view and then present my views to a partner and senior associate. This was discussion based and they pushed back on my arguments to see how I would respond to them. The interview was with a partner and a senior associate, with the partner taking the lead in the questioning.</li> </ul><p><strong>What is your best advice for each aspect of the assessment on the day? Please break this down for each assessment. This can include advice for preparation, as well as tips for the day.</strong></p><p></p><p>For the partner interview</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Macfarlanes makes this task easier than most firms by providing candidates with a list of the competencies they are looking for in the pre-interview material. A precis of this is also set out on the Macfarlanes website. This means that you don’t need to guess what they are looking for. It also allows you to prepare multiple examples for a single competency if one doesn’t quite suit. For instance, once I gave an example the partner said “ok, that’s a good example, but it’s a bit emotionally charged – do you have anything else?” Because I had prepared multiple I could pivot to the next one.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Have a really well thought out answer to the most basic “why law?” and “why Macfarlanes” questions and don’t be worried to talk about them at length. Macfarlanes is an unusual firm and they want you to demonstrate that you have thought about this and understand what they are all about – this also doubles up as a way to demonstrate commercial awareness and show that you get what the firm’s business strategy is, who their “best friend firms” are and so on. This in turn should point to why you’d want to work there.</li> </ul><p>For the client letter</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Ensure that your presentation is good – punctuation, grammar etc.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Don’t be afraid to use bullet points when listing.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Go through the available information with a fine toothed comb to ensure that you have caught all the legal issues raised. There were over a dozen in mine and I didn’t address them all. This was a weakness of my piece.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Make sure that all parts of the exercise are fleshed out. My feedback noted that one half of my answer was fuller than the other, even if it did the job.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Provide a clearly set out list of options for what the client can do, with a firm recommendation. Remember that doing nothing is always an option, as is doing something which makes the issue go away (such as an apology). Sometimes, the best advice a lawyer can give a client is to avoid the legal route entirely.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Make sure to sign off at the end, as you would if you were writing a letter to an actual client.</li> </ul><p>In-tray exercise</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Don’t be afraid to stand your ground. The partner deliberately challenged me to see if I was a pushover. If you think that your point is correct and can be supported by the evidence then take what the partner says on board, but still stick to your guns.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">At the same time, if you misinterpret something, don’t be afraid to change position.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Not knowing the answer or being uncertain is ok. In such circumstances preface your uncertainty and try to reason through the problem out loud. Even if the answer that you get to isn’t right, they will appreciate you demonstrating your critical skills to them.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Express interest. They liked that I followed up at the end with a question about how these cases resolved themselves in the real world and seemed genuinely interested in the answer.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Maintain formality. In feedback they commented that while I was very personable (which they liked), I sometimes became overly jokey.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Ensure that you have read the SRA’s guidelines about the duties that solicitors owe to their clients. This is invaluable when answering the ethical questions about whether or not you (in the example) fell below the duty of care. It also gives your answer a lot of heft when you can refer to the concrete legal standard.</li> </ul><p>Other notes</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This was by far the hardest AC that I have ever done – extremely intense and more or less on the go for 4 hours.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Considering that it was done online, it was done very smoothly and grad recruitment were totally lovely throughout.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The only part of the AC which isn’t application blind is the application interview. For the rest, they don’t know anything about you.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Macfarlanes make their decisions very quickly. If you get it, expect a phone call within 48 hours. If not, then an email saying “thanks but no thanks” within a week.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The involvement of grad recruitment in the day was, from my perspective, relatively slim. They were not present in any of the interviews and I got the sense that how well you scored (aside from the client letter, which I understand grad rec marks) was very much down to the interviewers themselves.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The most useful part of the preparation for me was shamelessly messaging current solicitors/trainees on Linkedin in areas which I’m interested in and asking for zoom coffee or to submit a list of written questions. Throughout the TC process, I’ve found that theI initially targeted alumni of my university and then broadened the search out further. My response rate was pretty good and it was invaluable for getting a sense of the culture and lingo of the place. This helped me answer the “why Macfarlanes” question and answer using the words of the people who already worked there.</li> </ul><p><strong>Were you successful?</strong></p><p></p><p>Yes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaysen, post: 97875, member: 1"] [B]Please state the month/year you interviewed at the firm.[/B] September 2021 [B]Please specify what the interview was for.[/B] Training contract commencing 2023 [B]Please give an overview of the day with approximate timings.[/B] These are very approximate as I can't quite remember the timings -- everything passed in such a blur. 9am: Arrive 9:15am: Partner interview 10:15am: Written exercise 11:45am: In-tray exercise 2pm: finish [B]Please provide a summary of each assessment on the day with approximate timings.[/B] [LIST] [*]The partner interview was with a single grad recruitment partner. There were no people from HR present at this interview. While the interview was in the standard competency interview format, my interviewer allowed me the space to build a rapport so I wasn’t confined solely to answering questions in a STAR format, although that was certainly required. [*]The written exercise took the form of writing a letter to a client and a supervisor on a commercial issue relating to [redacted] advertising. [*]The in-tray exercise took the form of three separate commercial and ethical issues based on previous cases and situations that the firm had handled in the past. I had to fillet the information in it, come up with a view and then present my views to a partner and senior associate. This was discussion based and they pushed back on my arguments to see how I would respond to them. The interview was with a partner and a senior associate, with the partner taking the lead in the questioning. [/LIST] [B]What is your best advice for each aspect of the assessment on the day? Please break this down for each assessment. This can include advice for preparation, as well as tips for the day.[/B] For the partner interview [LIST] [*]Macfarlanes makes this task easier than most firms by providing candidates with a list of the competencies they are looking for in the pre-interview material. A precis of this is also set out on the Macfarlanes website. This means that you don’t need to guess what they are looking for. It also allows you to prepare multiple examples for a single competency if one doesn’t quite suit. For instance, once I gave an example the partner said “ok, that’s a good example, but it’s a bit emotionally charged – do you have anything else?” Because I had prepared multiple I could pivot to the next one. [*]Have a really well thought out answer to the most basic “why law?” and “why Macfarlanes” questions and don’t be worried to talk about them at length. Macfarlanes is an unusual firm and they want you to demonstrate that you have thought about this and understand what they are all about – this also doubles up as a way to demonstrate commercial awareness and show that you get what the firm’s business strategy is, who their “best friend firms” are and so on. This in turn should point to why you’d want to work there. [/LIST] For the client letter [LIST] [*]Ensure that your presentation is good – punctuation, grammar etc. [*]Don’t be afraid to use bullet points when listing. [*]Go through the available information with a fine toothed comb to ensure that you have caught all the legal issues raised. There were over a dozen in mine and I didn’t address them all. This was a weakness of my piece. [*]Make sure that all parts of the exercise are fleshed out. My feedback noted that one half of my answer was fuller than the other, even if it did the job. [*]Provide a clearly set out list of options for what the client can do, with a firm recommendation. Remember that doing nothing is always an option, as is doing something which makes the issue go away (such as an apology). Sometimes, the best advice a lawyer can give a client is to avoid the legal route entirely. [*]Make sure to sign off at the end, as you would if you were writing a letter to an actual client. [/LIST] In-tray exercise [LIST] [*]Don’t be afraid to stand your ground. The partner deliberately challenged me to see if I was a pushover. If you think that your point is correct and can be supported by the evidence then take what the partner says on board, but still stick to your guns. [*]At the same time, if you misinterpret something, don’t be afraid to change position. [*]Not knowing the answer or being uncertain is ok. In such circumstances preface your uncertainty and try to reason through the problem out loud. Even if the answer that you get to isn’t right, they will appreciate you demonstrating your critical skills to them. [*]Express interest. They liked that I followed up at the end with a question about how these cases resolved themselves in the real world and seemed genuinely interested in the answer. [*]Maintain formality. In feedback they commented that while I was very personable (which they liked), I sometimes became overly jokey. [*]Ensure that you have read the SRA’s guidelines about the duties that solicitors owe to their clients. This is invaluable when answering the ethical questions about whether or not you (in the example) fell below the duty of care. It also gives your answer a lot of heft when you can refer to the concrete legal standard. [/LIST] Other notes [LIST] [*]This was by far the hardest AC that I have ever done – extremely intense and more or less on the go for 4 hours. [*]Considering that it was done online, it was done very smoothly and grad recruitment were totally lovely throughout. [*]The only part of the AC which isn’t application blind is the application interview. For the rest, they don’t know anything about you. [*]Macfarlanes make their decisions very quickly. If you get it, expect a phone call within 48 hours. If not, then an email saying “thanks but no thanks” within a week. [*]The involvement of grad recruitment in the day was, from my perspective, relatively slim. They were not present in any of the interviews and I got the sense that how well you scored (aside from the client letter, which I understand grad rec marks) was very much down to the interviewers themselves. [*]The most useful part of the preparation for me was shamelessly messaging current solicitors/trainees on Linkedin in areas which I’m interested in and asking for zoom coffee or to submit a list of written questions. Throughout the TC process, I’ve found that theI initially targeted alumni of my university and then broadened the search out further. My response rate was pretty good and it was invaluable for getting a sense of the culture and lingo of the place. This helped me answer the “why Macfarlanes” question and answer using the words of the people who already worked there. [/LIST] [B]Were you successful?[/B] Yes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Resources and Materials
Interview Experiences 2021 - 2022
Macfarlanes Interview 2021
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…