Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Forum Home
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Wiki
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
WIN: Lunch with Willkie Trainees!
15 Oct 2025
5:00 pm – 6:00 pm (UK)
Zoom (registration required)
Put your knowledge of Willkie Farr & Gallagher to the test in this interactive quiz session.
The winner will enjoy lunch with Willkie trainees!
Register on Zoom →
Home
Forum Home
Welcome To TCLA!
Introduce Yourself Here!
Parent looking for advice and information about law careers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 218264" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Hi [USER=42434]@Truecoconut[/USER] generally speaking, it is impossible to get a newly-qualified position in a practice area one has not experienced in their training contract. This is simply because not doing a seat in the area of qualification mean one will not have the prerequisite knowledge and experience to deal with the responsibilities of the role. Thus, if your son has only completed corporate and finance seats in his training contract, those are the only areas he will be able to work in as an associate. </p><p></p><p>Next, it is very difficult to secure an associate position in a practice area one has not qualified in. In essence, this would entail someone doing a number of seats at a firm in their training contract, choosing one seat to qualify in (say, corporate) and later on deciding to switch and then qualify in another seat they have previously done (say, finance). I have heard of it happening in a couple of cases, but these have always been highlighted to me as highly exceptional circumstances. </p><p></p><p>Furthermore, even if it were possible for your son to switch practices (which I doubt), it would likely not be advisable. The choice of the practice area to qualify in is often said to be the most important one in a commercial lawyer's career, as it impacts everything they do from that point onwards. As such, it is wise to pick the practice that is best suited to your long term interests and preferences rather than short-term considerations. </p><p></p><p>Finally, it is important to keep in mind that this is simply a bad moment in the market for associate retention in commercial law, particularly for corporate roles. It seems like law firms have significantly overhired in past years when the M&A market was hot and client demand high, while right now the markets are still generally quiet, so firms are correcting headcount figures by under hiring when compared to historical numbers. Nonetheless, sooner or later the corporate-finance markets are expected to pick up again, and your son will likely find a much easier time securing a role then.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 218264, member: 36777"] Hi [USER=42434]@Truecoconut[/USER] generally speaking, it is impossible to get a newly-qualified position in a practice area one has not experienced in their training contract. This is simply because not doing a seat in the area of qualification mean one will not have the prerequisite knowledge and experience to deal with the responsibilities of the role. Thus, if your son has only completed corporate and finance seats in his training contract, those are the only areas he will be able to work in as an associate. Next, it is very difficult to secure an associate position in a practice area one has not qualified in. In essence, this would entail someone doing a number of seats at a firm in their training contract, choosing one seat to qualify in (say, corporate) and later on deciding to switch and then qualify in another seat they have previously done (say, finance). I have heard of it happening in a couple of cases, but these have always been highlighted to me as highly exceptional circumstances. Furthermore, even if it were possible for your son to switch practices (which I doubt), it would likely not be advisable. The choice of the practice area to qualify in is often said to be the most important one in a commercial lawyer's career, as it impacts everything they do from that point onwards. As such, it is wise to pick the practice that is best suited to your long term interests and preferences rather than short-term considerations. Finally, it is important to keep in mind that this is simply a bad moment in the market for associate retention in commercial law, particularly for corporate roles. It seems like law firms have significantly overhired in past years when the M&A market was hot and client demand high, while right now the markets are still generally quiet, so firms are correcting headcount figures by under hiring when compared to historical numbers. Nonetheless, sooner or later the corporate-finance markets are expected to pick up again, and your son will likely find a much easier time securing a role then. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Home
Forum Home
Welcome To TCLA!
Introduce Yourself Here!
Parent looking for advice and information about law careers
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…