Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Precarity in the (mainly US) commercial property market
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jake Rickman" data-source="post: 143937" data-attributes="member: 8521"><p>Good morning everyone. </p><p></p><p>An issue I have been low-key tracking for a few weeks now is the anxiety that has gripped lenders and other investors in the commercial property markets, particularly in the United States. </p><p></p><p>By my read, the key word here is anxiety — not panic. This does not seem to reach the threshold of a market run like we have seen in certain aspects of the banking sector (e.g. SVB, Credit Suisse, etc.). Though, there is the chance that might change in the next few months. </p><p></p><p>Tell-tale signs that something is brewing — and has been for some time — is that large commercial lenders like investment banks specialist investors that deal primarily with commercial property (and associated structured finance products like commercial mortgage-backed securities [CMBS]), have been selling off their holdings at relatively steep discounts. </p><p></p><p>To illustrate the reasoning behind this, suppose you are holding on to a collection of commercial mortgages. For simplicity's sake, let's say you have 10 mortgages on your books. This represents ten separate obligations by the property owners that they will pay you the principal amount plus remaining interest on the loan. </p><p></p><p>Suppose all mortgages are for £1m each at 5% interest for 15 years. These lenders use special calculations called <strong>amortisation figures </strong>to work out how much the loan is worth right now. I am simplifying, but <a href="https://www.calculator.net/amortization-calculator.html?cloanamount=1%2C000%2C000&cloanterm=15&cloantermmonth=0&cinterestrate=5&cstartmonth=6&cstartyear=2023&cexma=0&cexmsm=6&cexmsy=2023&cexya=0&cexysm=6&cexysy=2023&cexoa=0&cexosm=6&cexosy=2023&caot=0&xa1=0&xm1=6&xy1=2023&xa2=0&xm2=6&xy2=2023&xa3=0&xm3=6&xy3=2023&xa4=0&xm4=6&xy4=2023&xa5=0&xm5=6&xy5=2023&xa6=0&xm6=6&xy6=2023&xa7=0&xm7=6&xy7=2023&xa8=0&xm8=6&xy8=2023&xa9=0&xm9=6&xy9=2023&xa10=0&xm10=6&xy10=2023&printit=0&x=Calculate#calresult" target="_blank">a simple amortisation calculation </a>might conclude that the face-value of these loans is £1.42m, representing both the principal amount (£1m) and the interest spread across 15 years. </p><p></p><p>Of course, the investors with the mortgages on their balance sheets never receive them upfront. The payments are spread across 15 years. </p><p></p><p>In an ideal world, you might be able to sell the mortgages at their face value — ~£1.4m — (minus a discount for receiving cash now rather than later due to the time value money principle). But if you are a lender that is concerned that there might be widespread defaults across the property value, you might accept far less to get these potentially risky loans off your balance sheet. After all, if a property owner cannot make the payments a year from now, the value of these loans might be worthless. </p><p></p><p>--</p><p></p><p>To spur some discussion, I'll put it to the forum and ask:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">What factors might explain why lenders are trying to get rid of their commercial property investments. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Which commercial clients stand to be affected? </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">What are the implications for law firms?</li> </ol><p></p><p>If this development picks up steam, I might also write one or more articles on it, especially if this is of interest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jake Rickman, post: 143937, member: 8521"] Good morning everyone. An issue I have been low-key tracking for a few weeks now is the anxiety that has gripped lenders and other investors in the commercial property markets, particularly in the United States. By my read, the key word here is anxiety — not panic. This does not seem to reach the threshold of a market run like we have seen in certain aspects of the banking sector (e.g. SVB, Credit Suisse, etc.). Though, there is the chance that might change in the next few months. Tell-tale signs that something is brewing — and has been for some time — is that large commercial lenders like investment banks specialist investors that deal primarily with commercial property (and associated structured finance products like commercial mortgage-backed securities [CMBS]), have been selling off their holdings at relatively steep discounts. To illustrate the reasoning behind this, suppose you are holding on to a collection of commercial mortgages. For simplicity's sake, let's say you have 10 mortgages on your books. This represents ten separate obligations by the property owners that they will pay you the principal amount plus remaining interest on the loan. Suppose all mortgages are for £1m each at 5% interest for 15 years. These lenders use special calculations called [B]amortisation figures [/B]to work out how much the loan is worth right now. I am simplifying, but [URL='https://www.calculator.net/amortization-calculator.html?cloanamount=1%2C000%2C000&cloanterm=15&cloantermmonth=0&cinterestrate=5&cstartmonth=6&cstartyear=2023&cexma=0&cexmsm=6&cexmsy=2023&cexya=0&cexysm=6&cexysy=2023&cexoa=0&cexosm=6&cexosy=2023&caot=0&xa1=0&xm1=6&xy1=2023&xa2=0&xm2=6&xy2=2023&xa3=0&xm3=6&xy3=2023&xa4=0&xm4=6&xy4=2023&xa5=0&xm5=6&xy5=2023&xa6=0&xm6=6&xy6=2023&xa7=0&xm7=6&xy7=2023&xa8=0&xm8=6&xy8=2023&xa9=0&xm9=6&xy9=2023&xa10=0&xm10=6&xy10=2023&printit=0&x=Calculate#calresult']a simple amortisation calculation [/URL]might conclude that the face-value of these loans is £1.42m, representing both the principal amount (£1m) and the interest spread across 15 years. Of course, the investors with the mortgages on their balance sheets never receive them upfront. The payments are spread across 15 years. In an ideal world, you might be able to sell the mortgages at their face value — ~£1.4m — (minus a discount for receiving cash now rather than later due to the time value money principle). But if you are a lender that is concerned that there might be widespread defaults across the property value, you might accept far less to get these potentially risky loans off your balance sheet. After all, if a property owner cannot make the payments a year from now, the value of these loans might be worthless. -- To spur some discussion, I'll put it to the forum and ask: [LIST=1] [*]What factors might explain why lenders are trying to get rid of their commercial property investments. [*]Which commercial clients stand to be affected? [*]What are the implications for law firms? [/LIST] If this development picks up steam, I might also write one or more articles on it, especially if this is of interest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Interviews & Vacation Schemes
Commercial Awareness Discussion
Precarity in the (mainly US) commercial property market
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…