Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Hey Guest,
Have an interview coming up?
We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week.
Book here
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) Forum
SQE Tell-all: All questions welcome
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="average_jo123" data-source="post: 216459" data-attributes="member: 15838"><p><h3>SQE2 reflection - TLDR version and key action points</h3><p>Upon reflection I feel my last post on my SQE2 results reflection was quite waffly but wasn't saying much. I think based on my results the two key points that I would have done differently would be as follows: </p><p></p><h4><em><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)">Cover the spec line-by-line</span></em></h4><p>Because ULaw didn't give us a study plan for SQE2 like they did for SQE1, I didn't quite cover all bases with my FLK as much as I did for SQE1. And this was probably where I lost marks on the law. Just remember to be just as meticulous as you were for covering the FLK in preparation for SQE2. </p><p></p><h4><em><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)">Examine the marking criteria</span></em></h4><p>As mentioned above, I think it is up to you how much weight you want to give to the marking criteria. But perhaps I could have scored higher and increased my chances of passing if I were more mindful of what I was being marked against.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="average_jo123, post: 216459, member: 15838"] [HEADING=2]SQE2 reflection - TLDR version and key action points[/HEADING] Upon reflection I feel my last post on my SQE2 results reflection was quite waffly but wasn't saying much. I think based on my results the two key points that I would have done differently would be as follows: [HEADING=3][I][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)]Cover the spec line-by-line[/COLOR][/I][/HEADING] Because ULaw didn't give us a study plan for SQE2 like they did for SQE1, I didn't quite cover all bases with my FLK as much as I did for SQE1. And this was probably where I lost marks on the law. Just remember to be just as meticulous as you were for covering the FLK in preparation for SQE2. [HEADING=3][I][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)]Examine the marking criteria[/COLOR][/I][/HEADING] As mentioned above, I think it is up to you how much weight you want to give to the marking criteria. But perhaps I could have scored higher and increased my chances of passing if I were more mindful of what I was being marked against. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) Forum
SQE Tell-all: All questions welcome
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…