Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Ropes & Gray:
What do Private Equity Lawyers Actually Do?
— Wed 14 Jan 2026, 5–6pm (UK), Zoom
Register →
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Resources and Materials
Interview Experiences 2018 - 2019 Cycle
Older Interview Experiences
Stephenson Harwood interview
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaysen" data-source="post: 974" data-attributes="member: 1"><p><strong>When was your Stephenson Harwood interview? </strong></p><p></p><p>February 2018 </p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>What was it for? </strong></p><p></p><p>Vacation Scheme</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Please describe the interview process at Stephenson Harwood.</strong></p><p></p><p>For the vacation scheme, the process is extremely simple, since there's only one interview with a member of the HR. They do not place as much emphasis on their 'placement scheme' as other firms, so this may explain it.</p><p></p><p>The firm was truly fantastic - I loved the offices and the atmosphere. They have been working hard to improve their image and I think they are doing a great job.</p><p></p><p><strong>What advice would you give to future applicants for the Stephenson Harwood interview?</strong></p><p></p><p>-First round interview: as above, this is the only assessment, meaning it is the only chance candidates have to impress the firm. I was told the interview would last around 40-45 minutes but ended up lasting an hour, so I guess they are flexible if the discussion allows it. By and large, the first 30 minutes ended up being occupied by competency-based questions - these were random and varied. For example, I was asked about a time an idea I put forward was challenged, and what steps I took to defend my position/compromise where necessary. Another example was when I found a new approach to a problem, and how that approach added to solving said problem more easily. As you can see, they try the more difficult/advanced competency based questions, because they do specify more than other firms, at least in my experience, usually do.</p><p></p><p>-The remaining time was spent on a background 'check', namely a discussion of past experiences, my contributions, why I had picked them up, what I would like to do in the future and so on. The member of the recruitment team asked me what skills I had developed through these experiences and how they were 'transferable', namely how I could apply them to a legal career. She clearly diverged this into a different type of competency questions. On top of this, she touched on the answers I had given in the application form, so do brush up on these.</p><p></p><p>-I must say, nonetheless, that I felt the interview was very individually-driven. She asked these questions on the basis of my answers and the general feel she had taken from my application form. I heard others had very different interview experiences so do prepare as widely as possible, you only have one interview to prepare for here.</p><p></p><p>-I was unsuccessful because, according to the feedback, my answers to the competency questions were not as thorough and did not fully answer what was being asked. If there is anything to get out of this, is to be as thorough as possible and stop talking only when you feel you have given a well-structured, persuasive and complete answer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaysen, post: 974, member: 1"] [B]When was your Stephenson Harwood interview? [/B] February 2018 [B] What was it for? [/B] Vacation Scheme [B] Please describe the interview process at Stephenson Harwood.[/B] For the vacation scheme, the process is extremely simple, since there's only one interview with a member of the HR. They do not place as much emphasis on their 'placement scheme' as other firms, so this may explain it. The firm was truly fantastic - I loved the offices and the atmosphere. They have been working hard to improve their image and I think they are doing a great job. [B]What advice would you give to future applicants for the Stephenson Harwood interview?[/B] -First round interview: as above, this is the only assessment, meaning it is the only chance candidates have to impress the firm. I was told the interview would last around 40-45 minutes but ended up lasting an hour, so I guess they are flexible if the discussion allows it. By and large, the first 30 minutes ended up being occupied by competency-based questions - these were random and varied. For example, I was asked about a time an idea I put forward was challenged, and what steps I took to defend my position/compromise where necessary. Another example was when I found a new approach to a problem, and how that approach added to solving said problem more easily. As you can see, they try the more difficult/advanced competency based questions, because they do specify more than other firms, at least in my experience, usually do. -The remaining time was spent on a background 'check', namely a discussion of past experiences, my contributions, why I had picked them up, what I would like to do in the future and so on. The member of the recruitment team asked me what skills I had developed through these experiences and how they were 'transferable', namely how I could apply them to a legal career. She clearly diverged this into a different type of competency questions. On top of this, she touched on the answers I had given in the application form, so do brush up on these. -I must say, nonetheless, that I felt the interview was very individually-driven. She asked these questions on the basis of my answers and the general feel she had taken from my application form. I heard others had very different interview experiences so do prepare as widely as possible, you only have one interview to prepare for here. -I was unsuccessful because, according to the feedback, my answers to the competency questions were not as thorough and did not fully answer what was being asked. If there is anything to get out of this, is to be as thorough as possible and stop talking only when you feel you have given a well-structured, persuasive and complete answer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Resources and Materials
Interview Experiences 2018 - 2019 Cycle
Older Interview Experiences
Stephenson Harwood interview
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…