Normal
It’s not dramatic - it’s good to know what happens in terms of best practice, and case law will impact that on a certain level.It is also useful to use decisions like this to reference why the adjustment is necessary.Where I get slightly cautious on this is the autism is a broad spectrum of conditions and I think it’s really difficult to apply adjustments consistently. Ultimately any employer/recruiter (and their test provider) should be adapting processes with some basic “best practice” approaches, and I would expect some neurodiverse candidates to have an adjustment to an SJT. This is why many tests have no time requirement, but I would stress that I personally feel this is still not sufficient in many cases.
It’s not dramatic - it’s good to know what happens in terms of best practice, and case law will impact that on a certain level.
It is also useful to use decisions like this to reference why the adjustment is necessary.
Where I get slightly cautious on this is the autism is a broad spectrum of conditions and I think it’s really difficult to apply adjustments consistently. Ultimately any employer/recruiter (and their test provider) should be adapting processes with some basic “best practice” approaches, and I would expect some neurodiverse candidates to have an adjustment to an SJT. This is why many tests have no time requirement, but I would stress that I personally feel this is still not sufficient in many cases.
