Normal
I'd say its 95%+ about the performance at the AC.However, when a candidate is borderline in a certain area or there is a slight concern/risk, firms can look back at evidence from earlier in the application process to judge whether there is stronger evidence or similarities of concern elsewhere.Prime example - very good written exercise but with some typos/spelling mistakes/grammatical errors. A firm then may go back and look at the application form to see if there were also typos/spelling mistakes in that document as well.
I'd say its 95%+ about the performance at the AC.
However, when a candidate is borderline in a certain area or there is a slight concern/risk, firms can look back at evidence from earlier in the application process to judge whether there is stronger evidence or similarities of concern elsewhere.
Prime example - very good written exercise but with some typos/spelling mistakes/grammatical errors. A firm then may go back and look at the application form to see if there were also typos/spelling mistakes in that document as well.
