Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ram Sabaratnam" data-source="post: 209992" data-attributes="member: 36738"><p>Hiya [USER=27532]@badmintonflyinginsect[/USER]</p><p></p><p></p><p>First of all, congratulations on your vacation scheme! Just wanted to chime in, but I'm sure that both [USER=36740]@Amma Usman[/USER] and [USER=36777]@Andrei Radu[/USER] would have some stellar advice for you as well. Although everyone’s experience can be a bit different, in my case, I’ve found that the tasks you’re given can vary. They can vary depending on the seat you’re in, the firm you're at, or the type of work the team has going on. That said, there were definitely some common threads across my various vac schemes.</p><p></p><p><strong>Typical tasks I completed:</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Proofreading:</strong> One of the most frequent tasks. I’d often be given a draft document (e.g. sometimes a contract, sometimes internal guidance or client comms) and be asked to check it for typos, formatting issues, hyperlinks, numbering errors, or clarity. Attention to detail really matters here. At one firm, I was able to stand out because I had figured out that there were some mistakes made in the calculation of certain figures in the document. Attention to detail can be a difficult skill to master, but I always think it's something that's worth practising now and into your scheme.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Meeting attendance and note-taking:</strong> I had the chance to join several internal or client-facing meetings during various vacation schemes (even attending one with the Prime Minister of a certain country!). During these, I was typically asked to take notes of the meeting and then circulate them afterwards to those who had attended. These didn’t have to be transcripts, but I aimed to summarise as many key discussion points, action items, and next steps clearly and concisely.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Drafting opportunities:</strong> During one scheme, I had the chance to draft an agreement entirely from scratch, based on some basic instructions. I typically found templates for these on Practical Law or by asking more senior trainees if they had any precedent documents on which I could go off of. At other firms, I was asked to revise certain clauses in contracts in order to ensure that they better met the client's goals.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Research:</strong> Research tasks varied widely in scope and complexity. Some were highly technical (e.g. researching insolvency provisions or the application of chemicals regulations) while others were more practical, such as checking public filings on Companies House or identifying regulatory triggers in M&A transactions. I’d highly recommend getting familiar with how to navigate Companies House if you're doing a transactional seat in particular.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Transactional tasks:</strong> In more corporate-heavy seats, I worked on conditions precedent (CP) checklists, reviewed share purchase agreements, and tried redrafting particularly tricky provisions that were apparently driving causing some challenges for the client. Sometimes, I’d also be asked to summarise the impact of certain clauses for a partner or associate, which required both comprehension and clear written explanation.</li> </ul><p><strong>Some useful skills:</strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Microsoft Office:</strong> It sounds basic, but being able to confidently navigate the Microsoft Office suite can be very helpful. This includes Word, Outlook, Excel, and Teams. You may be given lots of tasks which involve formatting documents, navigating tracked changes, creating internal tables of contents, and using Excel for lists or schedules. In particular, found that having strong Excel skills (e.g. filtering, basic formulas, formatting) made me stand out on a few schemes.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Practical Law/Lexis Nexis:</strong> If your university/work place has a subscription to either West Law or Lexis Nexis, I'd highly recommend taking a look at these sites and just learning how to navigate them. They are incredibly useful platforms, and learning how to use their search functions and resources effectively can really help you get through the tasks you're given, including any research and drafting tasks.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Responsiveness and professionalism:</strong> Responding to emails promptly (even if it’s just to say you’re on it or that you won't be able to take on a task due to capacity) is a skill that can go a long way. It shows that you’re reliable and thinking like a future trainee.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Initiative and curiosity:</strong> Sometimes a task won’t come with full instructions. If I wasn’t sure what a term meant or wanted to understand the deal/case more broadly, I’d take a few minutes to look things up myself before asking questions. That said, if something was genuinely unclear or ambiguous, I never hesitated to just ask other trainees or associates for clarification. This can make a big difference and help you better appreciate why a specific task is particularly relevant to the client matter.</li> </ul><p>Finally, I really want to emphasise this: Regardless of how small a task may seem to you, treat every task as a chance to show your work ethic, judgement, and attention to detail. In my experience, I've generally found that firms completely appreciate that this may be the first time you've ever attempted certain tasks. There were many times that I had submitted tasks with significant amounts of redlining (during one of my schemes, there was an entire document that I'd submitted which was completely revised and I still received the offer, ha!). What matters is how you demonstrate your reasoning when attempting certain tasks and showing that you're engaged. You don’t need to know everything, but being switched-on, asking any questions you have about deadlines and formatting at the outset, can leave a strong impression on those you're working with!</p><p></p><p>Good luck with the vacation scheme!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ram Sabaratnam, post: 209992, member: 36738"] Hiya [USER=27532]@badmintonflyinginsect[/USER] First of all, congratulations on your vacation scheme! Just wanted to chime in, but I'm sure that both [USER=36740]@Amma Usman[/USER] and [USER=36777]@Andrei Radu[/USER] would have some stellar advice for you as well. Although everyone’s experience can be a bit different, in my case, I’ve found that the tasks you’re given can vary. They can vary depending on the seat you’re in, the firm you're at, or the type of work the team has going on. That said, there were definitely some common threads across my various vac schemes. [B]Typical tasks I completed:[/B] [LIST] [*][B]Proofreading:[/B] One of the most frequent tasks. I’d often be given a draft document (e.g. sometimes a contract, sometimes internal guidance or client comms) and be asked to check it for typos, formatting issues, hyperlinks, numbering errors, or clarity. Attention to detail really matters here. At one firm, I was able to stand out because I had figured out that there were some mistakes made in the calculation of certain figures in the document. Attention to detail can be a difficult skill to master, but I always think it's something that's worth practising now and into your scheme. [*][B]Meeting attendance and note-taking:[/B] I had the chance to join several internal or client-facing meetings during various vacation schemes (even attending one with the Prime Minister of a certain country!). During these, I was typically asked to take notes of the meeting and then circulate them afterwards to those who had attended. These didn’t have to be transcripts, but I aimed to summarise as many key discussion points, action items, and next steps clearly and concisely. [*][B]Drafting opportunities:[/B] During one scheme, I had the chance to draft an agreement entirely from scratch, based on some basic instructions. I typically found templates for these on Practical Law or by asking more senior trainees if they had any precedent documents on which I could go off of. At other firms, I was asked to revise certain clauses in contracts in order to ensure that they better met the client's goals. [*][B]Research:[/B] Research tasks varied widely in scope and complexity. Some were highly technical (e.g. researching insolvency provisions or the application of chemicals regulations) while others were more practical, such as checking public filings on Companies House or identifying regulatory triggers in M&A transactions. I’d highly recommend getting familiar with how to navigate Companies House if you're doing a transactional seat in particular. [*][B]Transactional tasks:[/B] In more corporate-heavy seats, I worked on conditions precedent (CP) checklists, reviewed share purchase agreements, and tried redrafting particularly tricky provisions that were apparently driving causing some challenges for the client. Sometimes, I’d also be asked to summarise the impact of certain clauses for a partner or associate, which required both comprehension and clear written explanation. [/LIST] [B]Some useful skills:[/B] [LIST] [*][B]Microsoft Office:[/B] It sounds basic, but being able to confidently navigate the Microsoft Office suite can be very helpful. This includes Word, Outlook, Excel, and Teams. You may be given lots of tasks which involve formatting documents, navigating tracked changes, creating internal tables of contents, and using Excel for lists or schedules. In particular, found that having strong Excel skills (e.g. filtering, basic formulas, formatting) made me stand out on a few schemes. [*][B]Practical Law/Lexis Nexis:[/B] If your university/work place has a subscription to either West Law or Lexis Nexis, I'd highly recommend taking a look at these sites and just learning how to navigate them. They are incredibly useful platforms, and learning how to use their search functions and resources effectively can really help you get through the tasks you're given, including any research and drafting tasks. [*][B]Responsiveness and professionalism:[/B] Responding to emails promptly (even if it’s just to say you’re on it or that you won't be able to take on a task due to capacity) is a skill that can go a long way. It shows that you’re reliable and thinking like a future trainee. [*][B]Initiative and curiosity:[/B] Sometimes a task won’t come with full instructions. If I wasn’t sure what a term meant or wanted to understand the deal/case more broadly, I’d take a few minutes to look things up myself before asking questions. That said, if something was genuinely unclear or ambiguous, I never hesitated to just ask other trainees or associates for clarification. This can make a big difference and help you better appreciate why a specific task is particularly relevant to the client matter. [/LIST] Finally, I really want to emphasise this: Regardless of how small a task may seem to you, treat every task as a chance to show your work ethic, judgement, and attention to detail. In my experience, I've generally found that firms completely appreciate that this may be the first time you've ever attempted certain tasks. There were many times that I had submitted tasks with significant amounts of redlining (during one of my schemes, there was an entire document that I'd submitted which was completely revised and I still received the offer, ha!). What matters is how you demonstrate your reasoning when attempting certain tasks and showing that you're engaged. You don’t need to know everything, but being switched-on, asking any questions you have about deadlines and formatting at the outset, can leave a strong impression on those you're working with! Good luck with the vacation scheme! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…