Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trainee4u" data-source="post: 212074" data-attributes="member: 30779"><p>it depends exactly what you wrote. In general the big no-no is failing SQE. </p><p></p><p>In addition, candidates with SQE1 are somewhat more qualified/employable than those without. However merely "studying" SQE1 doesn't mean you are going to pass it - the fail rate for SQE1 is high. Therefore I wouldn't be too concerned about correcting this as your status as someone who was independently studying is basically zero - you didn't flop out of a course, you didn't fail the exam, you just decided (for the sake of argument) not to enter for the July sitting. </p><p></p><p>Most firms are looking two years ahead so your lack/deferred SQE1 would not really be relevant. However, there are a few firms who do recruit only SQE1-qualified TCs, so if that is the case for you it's something to perhaps correct.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trainee4u, post: 212074, member: 30779"] it depends exactly what you wrote. In general the big no-no is failing SQE. In addition, candidates with SQE1 are somewhat more qualified/employable than those without. However merely "studying" SQE1 doesn't mean you are going to pass it - the fail rate for SQE1 is high. Therefore I wouldn't be too concerned about correcting this as your status as someone who was independently studying is basically zero - you didn't flop out of a course, you didn't fail the exam, you just decided (for the sake of argument) not to enter for the July sitting. Most firms are looking two years ahead so your lack/deferred SQE1 would not really be relevant. However, there are a few firms who do recruit only SQE1-qualified TCs, so if that is the case for you it's something to perhaps correct. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…