Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Forum Home
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Wiki
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Reed Smith is live in the forum now
AMA
Live now
Graduate Recruitment and SQE interns from Reed Smith are here to answer your questions.
Join the live thread →
Willkie Live: How to Write a Successful Vacation Scheme Application
7 Oct 2025
5:30pm (UK)
Zoom (registration required)
Learn exactly how to write a successful application to Willkie Farr & Gallagher, with live examples + Q&A with
Gemma Baker
.
Register on Zoom →
Home
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trainee4u" data-source="post: 215247" data-attributes="member: 30779"><p>I was specifically told that it was a PFO for the scores - the email suggests it was not for the VI aspect:</p><p></p><p><em>Thank you for completing the Amberjack assessment for your Stephenson Harwood application.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Unforunately, your overall score has not met our criteria and we are unable to progress you to the next stage of the process on this occasion.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>You should have received a personalised feedback report from Amberjack. Please take some time to read through this and think about how you can best prepare for future assessments.</em></p><p></p><p>If one reads the feedback:</p><p></p><p>Creative (6/9) "This is an area where you demonstrated a good level of potential, although you occasionally missed a number of opportunities to take a forwardthinking approach in the situations presented to you, and could have done more to consider the bigger picture, identify opportunities for success and drive change for the better in the way that you responded."</p><p></p><p>Grit (7/9) "demonstrated clear strengths, showing that you were mostly able to overcome challenges in a positive and calm manner, and making a strong attempt to remain dedicated to successfully achieving your various tasks and responsibilities."</p><p></p><p>Digital Mindset (9/9) "exceptional potential."</p><p></p><p>Applied Intellect (4/9) "Based on your results on the assessment, you did show some good judgement, although this is an area you would really benefit from developing further. <strong>In the situations presented to you, you would have needed to respond quite differently to show empathy, understanding others, and self-awareness when interacting with a range of individuals."</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The "quite differently" does appear to be a "you are not good enough" response.</p><p></p><p>As such, it looks like you'd need to score 5+ on this.</p><p></p><p>While they clearly treat 4/9 on applied intellect as "you are unemployable, FOAD", I'm not sure that scoring 4/9 on other categories would necessarily result in the same response - not all of their pillars are necessarily of equal value.</p><p></p><p>They do say "your overall score" in the rejection,which implies they sum things, but I would guess that they don't necessarily do, so, as my overall 26/36 plus 5/6 on the verbal/numerical seems very good overall.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trainee4u, post: 215247, member: 30779"] I was specifically told that it was a PFO for the scores - the email suggests it was not for the VI aspect: [I]Thank you for completing the Amberjack assessment for your Stephenson Harwood application. Unforunately, your overall score has not met our criteria and we are unable to progress you to the next stage of the process on this occasion. You should have received a personalised feedback report from Amberjack. Please take some time to read through this and think about how you can best prepare for future assessments.[/I] If one reads the feedback: Creative (6/9) "This is an area where you demonstrated a good level of potential, although you occasionally missed a number of opportunities to take a forwardthinking approach in the situations presented to you, and could have done more to consider the bigger picture, identify opportunities for success and drive change for the better in the way that you responded." Grit (7/9) "demonstrated clear strengths, showing that you were mostly able to overcome challenges in a positive and calm manner, and making a strong attempt to remain dedicated to successfully achieving your various tasks and responsibilities." Digital Mindset (9/9) "exceptional potential." Applied Intellect (4/9) "Based on your results on the assessment, you did show some good judgement, although this is an area you would really benefit from developing further. [B]In the situations presented to you, you would have needed to respond quite differently to show empathy, understanding others, and self-awareness when interacting with a range of individuals."[/B] The "quite differently" does appear to be a "you are not good enough" response. As such, it looks like you'd need to score 5+ on this. While they clearly treat 4/9 on applied intellect as "you are unemployable, FOAD", I'm not sure that scoring 4/9 on other categories would necessarily result in the same response - not all of their pillars are necessarily of equal value. They do say "your overall score" in the rejection,which implies they sum things, but I would guess that they don't necessarily do, so, as my overall 26/36 plus 5/6 on the verbal/numerical seems very good overall. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Home
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…