Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 184286" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Since they emailed you that they will not be progressing the application because the places had been filled rather than rejecting it, I would also say there is a good chance they have not actually reviewed it. However, the application answers might still have been saved in the system and although no one has read them, the similarity might still be flagged when you apply again. This might be an issue and I would therefore agree with [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER]'s advice to try to change them in some way or another. </p><p></p><p>However, I do not think you need to completely rewrite the application. You might just rephrase some sections or change some of the examples you use to illustrate your points. To reduce the time it takes to do this, you could use some AI tools - I have heard they are especially good at reorganizing and reformulating points. I think if you were happy with the quality of the initial application, you do not need to achieve much more besides making just enough changes so that it doesn't look like you have copy and pasted it. </p><p></p><p>That said, if you are very short on time and/or this is not a firm you are that interested in, you could also just submit the initial application as is and run the risk of it becoming an issue if flagged.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 184286, member: 36777"] Since they emailed you that they will not be progressing the application because the places had been filled rather than rejecting it, I would also say there is a good chance they have not actually reviewed it. However, the application answers might still have been saved in the system and although no one has read them, the similarity might still be flagged when you apply again. This might be an issue and I would therefore agree with [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER]'s advice to try to change them in some way or another. However, I do not think you need to completely rewrite the application. You might just rephrase some sections or change some of the examples you use to illustrate your points. To reduce the time it takes to do this, you could use some AI tools - I have heard they are especially good at reorganizing and reformulating points. I think if you were happy with the quality of the initial application, you do not need to achieve much more besides making just enough changes so that it doesn't look like you have copy and pasted it. That said, if you are very short on time and/or this is not a firm you are that interested in, you could also just submit the initial application as is and run the risk of it becoming an issue if flagged. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…