Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 186455" data-attributes="member: 36777">I don't think there is a right and wrong approach to structure as long as you cover everything you are asked for and as long as it is clear and easy to follow. However, the structure I would implement would be this:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Why commercial law: in around 250-300 words, I would explain the substantive reasons why I am attracted to both law and business, and would seek to include the experiences that best illustrate them.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Why Freshfields: in around 300 words, I would focus on two or three unique selling points of the firm and link those to my motivations and experiences.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Why you: in around 250 words, I would focus on two or three experiences/achievements which I would describe using the STAR structure. I would at the end make sure to link the experiences/achievements with skills/attributes that show your potential to be a great trainee. </li> </ol></blockquote>

Verification: Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Top Bottom