Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 188594" data-attributes="member: 36777">This sounds like a good answer to me. The only thing I would chance is maybe trying to emphasize more the points regarding legal research and what you think may be particularly worth looking into, such as: different regulatory frameworks for employment and consumer contracts, the different 'market terms' for supply and distribution, different approval processes and waiting periods for setting up a new company there etc. Ideally, I think your answer should combine a mixture of 'framework of analysis' points (which you have done a great job in covering) and also a number points around your informed guesses as to what might actually be of relevance. The later bit is just to show general commercial awareness, in this case about what legal issues come into play when a business is expanding in a new jurisdiction.The other point I wanted to make is that I can completely understand feeling a bit 'flakey' when responding to situational questions. I used to feel the same and I think that is to an extent unavoidable simply because of how vague their formulation is. However, recruiters will also be aware that they are giving you very limited information to work with. Thus they will not expect much in terms of substantive points - rather, they will look to assess your commercial awareness and ability to show you can work through a problem in a structured manner.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 188594, member: 36777"] This sounds like a good answer to me. The only thing I would chance is maybe trying to emphasize more the points regarding legal research and what you think may be particularly worth looking into, such as: different regulatory frameworks for employment and consumer contracts, the different 'market terms' for supply and distribution, different approval processes and waiting periods for setting up a new company there etc. Ideally, I think your answer should combine a mixture of 'framework of analysis' points (which you have done a great job in covering) and also a number points around your informed guesses as to what might actually be of relevance. The later bit is just to show general commercial awareness, in this case about what legal issues come into play when a business is expanding in a new jurisdiction. The other point I wanted to make is that I can completely understand feeling a bit 'flakey' when responding to situational questions. I used to feel the same and I think that is to an extent unavoidable simply because of how vague their formulation is. However, recruiters will also be aware that they are giving you very limited information to work with. Thus they will not expect much in terms of substantive points - rather, they will look to assess your commercial awareness and ability to show you can work through a problem in a structured manner. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Search

Search

Reply to thread