Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amma Usman" data-source="post: 193643" data-attributes="member: 36740"><p>Hey [USER=31325]@mulan0[/USER] ,</p><p></p><p>The way I see it, it’s a hybrid question asking for ‘why commercial law’ and why DWF’. I noticed this because of the inclusion of the word <em>solicitor. </em>I think the even split is a good idea, but you don’t have to strictly follow that approach. I will personally split the question into two paragraphs, covering each question in one paragraph. You may find that you will have less to say on why CL. Now, this will allow you to focus more on why DWF so you can actually touch more on their practices that appeal to you - and why. This should not come at the expense of fully explaining why CL though. If you can cover that in a few sentences and hit the nail on the head with that, then there is no disputing that you would have had a solid answer to that.</p><p></p><p>Best wishes with the application!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amma Usman, post: 193643, member: 36740"] Hey [USER=31325]@mulan0[/USER] , The way I see it, it’s a hybrid question asking for ‘why commercial law’ and why DWF’. I noticed this because of the inclusion of the word [I]solicitor. [/I]I think the even split is a good idea, but you don’t have to strictly follow that approach. I will personally split the question into two paragraphs, covering each question in one paragraph. You may find that you will have less to say on why CL. Now, this will allow you to focus more on why DWF so you can actually touch more on their practices that appeal to you - and why. This should not come at the expense of fully explaining why CL though. If you can cover that in a few sentences and hit the nail on the head with that, then there is no disputing that you would have had a solid answer to that. Best wishes with the application! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…