🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is 20th June.

👉 Read Becca's announcement post here
📝 Apply directly here

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Amma Usman" data-source="post: 196194" data-attributes="member: 36740">Hi there, Thanks for the question.As you can imagine, the difference in why law and why commercial law lies in the commerce part. This is a difficult distinction to employ, largely because you need to know your experiences in and out to effectively draw a  distinction that shows specific interest In CL particularly. You not only need to know your experiences well , but your journey actually. For me, taking the journey approach in interviews enabled me to show my truth - tell my story. I was able to start off by saying okay I explored this area of law, didn’t like it. I explored this next area of law and liked this and that, but not that. Then I explored business law and liked it more combined than the other areas of law. For me, I knew I wanted to be a lawyer regardless of specialisation. Studying a law degree certainly helped, but it was not the deciding factor. Your inclusion of the mergers module course is good, but you need to be more specific. What did you learn and how did that differ from your past legal experiences. Further, why is it that one that appealed more? You may have learnt about a certain type of law, say competition law, through learning about how the Commission or CMA in the context of the UK may stop mergers due to the potential to lead to the abuse of a dominant position. As competition law is a practice within a commercial law firm, you can certainly expand on this in interviews. This is just one of the many examples on how you can go further into what you learnt to distinguish the business side of law from say… immigration or family law.</blockquote>

Verification: Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Top Bottom

Search

Search

Reply to thread