Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Booker" data-source="post: 199342" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>I'd stress it isn't always just saying this for the sake of saying it - I don't think any recruiter wants to waste the candidate's or the their time.</p><p></p><p>I have encouraged people to reapply in the hope they would improve in the areas we identified where they needed a stronger performance on the vacation scheme, and then when it has come around to them applying, we just didn't see enough evidence of that development to warrant bringing them through again. Sometimes their application form just hasn't met expectations the second time around or they didn't perform as strongly in certain assessments. Its been disappointing when that has happened, as I generally only encouraged people to reapply if I felt there was a chance they could improve.</p><p></p><p>On the other side, I gave very strong hints to people that we didn't feel they should reapply (but couldn't tell them not to) as we didn't feel they were suited to the firm, but many would reapply anyway!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Booker, post: 199342, member: 2672"] I'd stress it isn't always just saying this for the sake of saying it - I don't think any recruiter wants to waste the candidate's or the their time. I have encouraged people to reapply in the hope they would improve in the areas we identified where they needed a stronger performance on the vacation scheme, and then when it has come around to them applying, we just didn't see enough evidence of that development to warrant bringing them through again. Sometimes their application form just hasn't met expectations the second time around or they didn't perform as strongly in certain assessments. Its been disappointing when that has happened, as I generally only encouraged people to reapply if I felt there was a chance they could improve. On the other side, I gave very strong hints to people that we didn't feel they should reapply (but couldn't tell them not to) as we didn't feel they were suited to the firm, but many would reapply anyway! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…