Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amma Usman" data-source="post: 207213" data-attributes="member: 36740"><p>I think it really comes down to weighing your priorities and considering which firm is the better fit for you long-term. Have you taken the time to compare both firms in terms of culture, practice areas, training opportunities, and overall career trajectory?</p><p></p><p><strong>Some things to consider include: </strong></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Long-term career prospects -</strong> Which firm aligns more closely with your career goals? Consider factors like practice area strengths, international opportunities, and secondment options.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Training and development -</strong> How structured and comprehensive is the training at each firm? Look at feedback from current trainees, the level of responsibility given early on, and the support available.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Firm culture and working environment -</strong> Have you spoken to trainees or associates at both firms? Understanding the work culture, team dynamics, and overall firm ethos could be crucial in making your decision.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Retention rates and progression - </strong>What percentage of trainees stay on as associates? I would not look at these figures so closely though, as they may change every year and for various factors beyond the nature of the firm itself.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Reputation and deal flow - </strong>Consider the firm’s standing in the market and the type of work you’d be exposed to. Are they industry leaders in your areas of interest?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Personal preference and gut feeling -</strong> Beyond the tangible factors, which firm excites you more? Where do you see yourself thriving?</li> </ul><p></p><p>Going ahead with the AC ultimately depends on which opportunity matters more to you. Have you also considered the possibility of later reaching out to either firm to see if they’d allow you to defer to another scheme? If this is something that is possible, you should aim to recommend deferring to a scheme within this cycle though, as deferring to future cycles is less common among firms. I have tagged [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER] here as I’m sure she’ll have more thoughts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amma Usman, post: 207213, member: 36740"] I think it really comes down to weighing your priorities and considering which firm is the better fit for you long-term. Have you taken the time to compare both firms in terms of culture, practice areas, training opportunities, and overall career trajectory? [B]Some things to consider include: [/B] [LIST] [*][B]Long-term career prospects -[/B] Which firm aligns more closely with your career goals? Consider factors like practice area strengths, international opportunities, and secondment options. [*][B]Training and development -[/B] How structured and comprehensive is the training at each firm? Look at feedback from current trainees, the level of responsibility given early on, and the support available. [*][B]Firm culture and working environment -[/B] Have you spoken to trainees or associates at both firms? Understanding the work culture, team dynamics, and overall firm ethos could be crucial in making your decision. [*][B]Retention rates and progression - [/B]What percentage of trainees stay on as associates? I would not look at these figures so closely though, as they may change every year and for various factors beyond the nature of the firm itself. [*][B]Reputation and deal flow - [/B]Consider the firm’s standing in the market and the type of work you’d be exposed to. Are they industry leaders in your areas of interest? [*][B]Personal preference and gut feeling -[/B] Beyond the tangible factors, which firm excites you more? Where do you see yourself thriving? [/LIST] Going ahead with the AC ultimately depends on which opportunity matters more to you. Have you also considered the possibility of later reaching out to either firm to see if they’d allow you to defer to another scheme? If this is something that is possible, you should aim to recommend deferring to a scheme within this cycle though, as deferring to future cycles is less common among firms. I have tagged [USER=2672]@Jessica Booker[/USER] here as I’m sure she’ll have more thoughts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…