Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BBsharkk" data-source="post: 208311" data-attributes="member: 26519"><p>Yes, from a purely common sense perspective I see no point of them stalling or even inviting more ppl for interview if they feel like the ones who interviewed (likely to be a ballpark of 50-60 ppl) are good enough to fill the 20 places across 2 VS. </p><p>The inference here is that they feel most of those they interviewed were not "good enough", hence the decision to invite more for interviews. The reason they haven't sent PFOs out straight away is because it's literally the first time they're sending out PFOs and having only one interview stage means there's not enough data points or benchmark for them to reject the ones who score the lowest immediately, especially when almost all interviewees get different partners for their interviews - it's incredibly subjective.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BBsharkk, post: 208311, member: 26519"] Yes, from a purely common sense perspective I see no point of them stalling or even inviting more ppl for interview if they feel like the ones who interviewed (likely to be a ballpark of 50-60 ppl) are good enough to fill the 20 places across 2 VS. The inference here is that they feel most of those they interviewed were not "good enough", hence the decision to invite more for interviews. The reason they haven't sent PFOs out straight away is because it's literally the first time they're sending out PFOs and having only one interview stage means there's not enough data points or benchmark for them to reject the ones who score the lowest immediately, especially when almost all interviewees get different partners for their interviews - it's incredibly subjective. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…