Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="broalabear" data-source="post: 209498" data-attributes="member: 40098"><p>Quick WG Assumption Q:</p><p></p><p><strong>For humankind to survive, it must colonise other planets.</strong></p><p>Assumption - There will be a time when the Earth can no longer sustain human life.</p><p></p><p>Am I right in saying that an assumption has been made here?</p><p></p><p>The only thing I can think of against this is that Earth may very well sustain human life, but not be sufficient. Then again, that would mean that it technically cannot sustain human life, and therefore, the assumption is made. </p><p></p><p>Also, if I were to invert this: There will be a time when the Earth <em>can </em>sustain human life, then the proposed statement becomes redundant, which should logically indicate that there is an assumption, no?</p><p></p><p>3.30 am yk, I <strong>hate </strong>these damn tests.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="broalabear, post: 209498, member: 40098"] Quick WG Assumption Q: [B]For humankind to survive, it must colonise other planets.[/B] Assumption - There will be a time when the Earth can no longer sustain human life. Am I right in saying that an assumption has been made here? The only thing I can think of against this is that Earth may very well sustain human life, but not be sufficient. Then again, that would mean that it technically cannot sustain human life, and therefore, the assumption is made. Also, if I were to invert this: There will be a time when the Earth [I]can [/I]sustain human life, then the proposed statement becomes redundant, which should logically indicate that there is an assumption, no? 3.30 am yk, I [B]hate [/B]these damn tests. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…