🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is 20th June.

👉 Read Becca's announcement post here
📝 Apply directly here

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 210185" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Yes, I think this is essentially the right approach. I would just take a lot of care to maintain proper structure by continuously signposting and using connectors. For me, the answer therefore ended up looking something like this:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">There are three key reasons you should hire me: as I will explain and as my prior experience and achievements demonstrate, I am X, Y, and Z (name the three qualities).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Firstly, during ... (introduce example and go through a concise version of it using the STAR structure). This demonstrates X quality, which makes me a great fit for the job because ... (explain its relevance to the role of a trainee/commercial law in general. To the extent possible, make an argument that this quality is perhaps more important for success than the other commonly named relevant ones). </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Repeat for Z and Y. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">To conclude, my experiences demonstrate I am X, Y, and Z, which make me a great fit for the position. </li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Top Bottom