Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
🚨 Reed Smith has just announced its Direct Training Contract route!
The deadline is
20th June
.
👉
Read Becca's announcement post here
📝
Apply directly here
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ram Sabaratnam" data-source="post: 212178" data-attributes="member: 36738"><p>Hey [USER=7258]@l789[/USER]</p><p></p><p>I want to echo what [USER=40237]@ZNadeem[/USER] said and share some ideas that really helped me when I was in your shoes.</p><p></p><p>First, I'd encourage you to stop comparing yourself to people with investment banking or private equity internships. I know it’s hard not to, but that sort of experience <em>does not</em> automatically make someone a stronger candidate. When I was applying, I didn’t have any of that. I had pro bono experience and experience in retail and higher education. That’s it. And yet I managed to secure vac schemes or ACs at firms with powerhouse PE teams, like Goodwin, Ropes, Weil - often over people who <em>did</em> have that kind of background. What made the difference wasn’t my experience on paper. Rather, it was how I discussed my experiences, commercial matters, and how I connected what I’d done to what these firms needed. These are all things <em>you</em> can do too.</p><p></p><p>Second, you do <em>not</em> need a background in finance or PE to think critically and speak persuasively about commercial issues. In fact, some people with investment banking or PE experience struggle to break out of groupthink and actually struggle to speak or think about more macro issues that bear on their respective industries. What will set you apart isn’t mimicking them. It’s showing that you’re curious and able to think about business in a critical and engaged way. That’s a skill, and again it’s one you <em>can</em> build.</p><p></p><p>Finally, the fact that you’re getting to interview stages already says a lot. That means firms see your potential. So now it’s about tightening your focus. Maybe it’s the way you structure your answers. Maybe it's the way your demonstrating commercial awareness. Maybe it’s how you’re positioning your experiences. All of that is within your control. Your pro bono and retail experience aren’t liabilities. They’re assets. You just need to show how they’ve shaped your motivations and the kind of lawyer you’ll be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ram Sabaratnam, post: 212178, member: 36738"] Hey [USER=7258]@l789[/USER] I want to echo what [USER=40237]@ZNadeem[/USER] said and share some ideas that really helped me when I was in your shoes. First, I'd encourage you to stop comparing yourself to people with investment banking or private equity internships. I know it’s hard not to, but that sort of experience [I]does not[/I] automatically make someone a stronger candidate. When I was applying, I didn’t have any of that. I had pro bono experience and experience in retail and higher education. That’s it. And yet I managed to secure vac schemes or ACs at firms with powerhouse PE teams, like Goodwin, Ropes, Weil - often over people who [I]did[/I] have that kind of background. What made the difference wasn’t my experience on paper. Rather, it was how I discussed my experiences, commercial matters, and how I connected what I’d done to what these firms needed. These are all things [I]you[/I] can do too. Second, you do [I]not[/I] need a background in finance or PE to think critically and speak persuasively about commercial issues. In fact, some people with investment banking or PE experience struggle to break out of groupthink and actually struggle to speak or think about more macro issues that bear on their respective industries. What will set you apart isn’t mimicking them. It’s showing that you’re curious and able to think about business in a critical and engaged way. That’s a skill, and again it’s one you [I]can[/I] build. Finally, the fact that you’re getting to interview stages already says a lot. That means firms see your potential. So now it’s about tightening your focus. Maybe it’s the way you structure your answers. Maybe it's the way your demonstrating commercial awareness. Maybe it’s how you’re positioning your experiences. All of that is within your control. Your pro bono and retail experience aren’t liabilities. They’re assets. You just need to show how they’ve shaped your motivations and the kind of lawyer you’ll be. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…