Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
Ropes & Gray:
What do Private Equity Lawyers Actually Do?
— Wed 14 Jan 2026, 5–6pm (UK), Zoom
Register →
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 219583" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Just to jump in - as long as you keep it to one example which you explain in depth, I cannot imagine the firm would have an issue with you connecting that to more than one of their values. That said, to hedge against any such risk I would perhaps:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Choose one value as the "dominant" value,</strong> which you explore in more depth and make more central to your point; and introduce the others more like "Also" points rather than points of equivalent importance to the main one. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Still ensure you prioritise depth over depth</strong> - I would ensure that you properly analyse the importance of its value and how it connects to your experience; as if the firm had any reticence in terms of you mentioning more than one value, it would probably have to do with you not fleshing out your points in enough detail. </li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 219583, member: 36777"] Just to jump in - as long as you keep it to one example which you explain in depth, I cannot imagine the firm would have an issue with you connecting that to more than one of their values. That said, to hedge against any such risk I would perhaps: [LIST=1] [*][B]Choose one value as the "dominant" value,[/B] which you explore in more depth and make more central to your point; and introduce the others more like "Also" points rather than points of equivalent importance to the main one. [*][B]Still ensure you prioritise depth over depth[/B] - I would ensure that you properly analyse the importance of its value and how it connects to your experience; as if the firm had any reticence in terms of you mentioning more than one value, it would probably have to do with you not fleshing out your points in enough detail. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…