Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 221701" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Hi [USER=8993]@pfoapplicant[/USER] for the first question, I think it is fine (and, likely, also advisable) to include you role as president as the fifth entry. The firm asks you to include only the "most relevant" roles - an expression I interpret as referring to those that are most indicative of how well you "fit" the firm. Thus, in determining what to include,<strong> I would focus on (i) roles that represent your most significant achievements and demonstrate your skills and abilities; and (ii) roles that are most closely connected to your motivations to work as a commercial solicitor at the firm. </strong>Your role as president of a law society scores highly in both categories, so I would argue it should definitely be included; at the very least, it appears to me it definitely scores higher on both criteria when compared to things like playing in the university's tennis team.</p><p></p><p>As for your worry as appearing too "law-focused", I would advise you not to be too concerned - after all, you are applying to join a law firm, where almost everything you do will have to do with law! If the firm wanted to see more of your personality and ascertain how "well-rounded" you are as a person at the application form stage, they could have easily done so by including questions targeting this. You should not read a hidden intention on their part to do this covertly; <strong>one of the things I hear recruiters most often complaining about is that many candidates read things into their questions and prompts that they were simply not asking. </strong></p><p></p><p>For you second question: I think it would make sense to use a roughly 150-words limit as a starting point when writing the entries. If you find that you have lots of valuable content left to cover for a role and are not able to do so within this limit (even if writing in a very concise manner), I think you could write up to around 250-300 words per entry.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 221701, member: 36777"] Hi [USER=8993]@pfoapplicant[/USER] for the first question, I think it is fine (and, likely, also advisable) to include you role as president as the fifth entry. The firm asks you to include only the "most relevant" roles - an expression I interpret as referring to those that are most indicative of how well you "fit" the firm. Thus, in determining what to include,[B] I would focus on (i) roles that represent your most significant achievements and demonstrate your skills and abilities; and (ii) roles that are most closely connected to your motivations to work as a commercial solicitor at the firm. [/B]Your role as president of a law society scores highly in both categories, so I would argue it should definitely be included; at the very least, it appears to me it definitely scores higher on both criteria when compared to things like playing in the university's tennis team. As for your worry as appearing too "law-focused", I would advise you not to be too concerned - after all, you are applying to join a law firm, where almost everything you do will have to do with law! If the firm wanted to see more of your personality and ascertain how "well-rounded" you are as a person at the application form stage, they could have easily done so by including questions targeting this. You should not read a hidden intention on their part to do this covertly; [B]one of the things I hear recruiters most often complaining about is that many candidates read things into their questions and prompts that they were simply not asking. [/B] For you second question: I think it would make sense to use a roughly 150-words limit as a starting point when writing the entries. If you find that you have lots of valuable content left to cover for a role and are not able to do so within this limit (even if writing in a very concise manner), I think you could write up to around 250-300 words per entry. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…