Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 222475" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>I remember a couple of years back a recruiter at the firm said they do not review the answers. I would assume this still holds true simply because it makes sense from a workload management perspective on their side: recruiters at firms like Clifford Chance are absolutely swamped with applications and normally have to make decisions in a matter of mere minutes on whether to progress or reject a candidate. As such, it is very unlikely they could afford to invest what would be a significant amount of time in checking the quality of work in a task ancillary to the application - particularly since such an exercise would require the recruiters to also understand the nature of the legal problems and technical solutions in said tasks, which is something the firm would need to provide them with further training for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 222475, member: 36777"] I remember a couple of years back a recruiter at the firm said they do not review the answers. I would assume this still holds true simply because it makes sense from a workload management perspective on their side: recruiters at firms like Clifford Chance are absolutely swamped with applications and normally have to make decisions in a matter of mere minutes on whether to progress or reject a candidate. As such, it is very unlikely they could afford to invest what would be a significant amount of time in checking the quality of work in a task ancillary to the application - particularly since such an exercise would require the recruiters to also understand the nature of the legal problems and technical solutions in said tasks, which is something the firm would need to provide them with further training for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…