Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 226481" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Hi [USER=41021]@CharlesT47[/USER] while this is not a topic I am extremely knowledgeable about, I will list some points of analysis that you could consider addressing in your answer:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The positive impacts may be gradual rather than immediate, as from my understanding the lowering of the capital adequacy threshold will only be implemented in 2027;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">This is thought to come with a positive effect on general economic growth, as an increase in credit supply allows more borrowing from both businesses (and thus to invest in upscaling, increasing productivity, research and development, and hiring), and consumers (thus increasing their purchasing power and boosting the demand and revenue of aforementioned businesses), which can create a virtuous growth cycle. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">At the same time, the relaxation of capital rules always comes with at least some increase in systemic risk in the banking sector, thus making economic growth and financial stability and resilience competing objectives that need to be balanced. In your analysis, you may want to consider this negative side effect and express a judgement as to whether, all thing considered, this is a good idea or not. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In terms of finance dealmaking, this should increase activity of traditional finance (as it will be easier for more companies to take out more loans) and securitisation and capital markets departments of law firms (as banks will then be looking to package and sell a greater amount of debt on secondary markets);</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In terms of corporate dealmaking, I think your assessment is generally on point. I would agree with you that capital intensive industries stand to benefit most from this, and, in particular, life sciences companies could be big winners, as this is currently thought to be the area where UK companies innovate the most and are most relevant in the modern global economy. On this point, I would also add that PE funds likely stand to benefit a lot, as availability of huge amounts of debt finance is central to the leveraged buyout model. </li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 226481, member: 36777"] Hi [USER=41021]@CharlesT47[/USER] while this is not a topic I am extremely knowledgeable about, I will list some points of analysis that you could consider addressing in your answer: [LIST] [*]The positive impacts may be gradual rather than immediate, as from my understanding the lowering of the capital adequacy threshold will only be implemented in 2027; [*]This is thought to come with a positive effect on general economic growth, as an increase in credit supply allows more borrowing from both businesses (and thus to invest in upscaling, increasing productivity, research and development, and hiring), and consumers (thus increasing their purchasing power and boosting the demand and revenue of aforementioned businesses), which can create a virtuous growth cycle. [*]At the same time, the relaxation of capital rules always comes with at least some increase in systemic risk in the banking sector, thus making economic growth and financial stability and resilience competing objectives that need to be balanced. In your analysis, you may want to consider this negative side effect and express a judgement as to whether, all thing considered, this is a good idea or not. [*]In terms of finance dealmaking, this should increase activity of traditional finance (as it will be easier for more companies to take out more loans) and securitisation and capital markets departments of law firms (as banks will then be looking to package and sell a greater amount of debt on secondary markets); [*]In terms of corporate dealmaking, I think your assessment is generally on point. I would agree with you that capital intensive industries stand to benefit most from this, and, in particular, life sciences companies could be big winners, as this is currently thought to be the area where UK companies innovate the most and are most relevant in the modern global economy. On this point, I would also add that PE funds likely stand to benefit a lot, as availability of huge amounts of debt finance is central to the leveraged buyout model. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…