Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zonnonomo" data-source="post: 226809" data-attributes="member: 39138"><p>they asked this question in the video interview last year! i progressed to ac and my answer was</p><p></p><p>1. current regulation of social media as intermediaries</p><p>2. clarifying the difference between regulating the social media companies themselves vs scrutinising individuals' posts </p><p>3. importance of privacy and freedom of speech rights of individual, but recognised security or hate speech concerns </p><p>4. alternative to regulation: incentivise social media to develop beneficial community guidelines/ self correcting policies</p><p>5. problem with proposed solution: private companies acting as arbiters of justice, potentially impinging on public rights </p><p></p><p>which is to say there really was no structure at all but i think VI format allowed that flexibility 🤔</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zonnonomo, post: 226809, member: 39138"] they asked this question in the video interview last year! i progressed to ac and my answer was 1. current regulation of social media as intermediaries 2. clarifying the difference between regulating the social media companies themselves vs scrutinising individuals' posts 3. importance of privacy and freedom of speech rights of individual, but recognised security or hate speech concerns 4. alternative to regulation: incentivise social media to develop beneficial community guidelines/ self correcting policies 5. problem with proposed solution: private companies acting as arbiters of justice, potentially impinging on public rights which is to say there really was no structure at all but i think VI format allowed that flexibility 🤔 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…