Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 227096" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Hi [USER=40039]@panda1989[/USER] unfortunately I cannot give you very specific advice as to how to structure a written exercise, simply because the type of structure that works will depend a lot on the details of the exercise itself and the information you have to cover. Looking back at my written exercises, the only common features in terms of structure that I tended to observe were the following: </p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>An introductory executive summary heading with a short paragraph following it</strong>, which explains the scope of my analysis, the core point of each section, and the main conclusion.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Having different big headings for different parts of the task</strong> (ie if an email I had to respond to asked me three different questions, I would separate my writing in three different sections)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Having headings/subheadings for core assessment criteria</strong>: as you are reading the relevant information, ask yourself what are the core cost/benefit factors you need to consider; sometimes, this provides you an easy way to present information and structure your analysis. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Sometimes, separating section by subheading such as "Brief Summary" and "Analysis" can make sense</strong>, such as to clearly convey both what is uncontroversial factual information and what is your own viewpoint. </li> </ol><p>As for impact of news stories, when reading about a story I think you should always be asking yourself "<em>how could this impact businesses</em>?" and then "<em>how does this impact change what they want from their lawyers</em>?". Some stories have very easy and direct answers to both: eg a lowering of interest rates reduces borrowing costs, which makes deal financing cheaper and reduces valuation gaps between buyers and sellers, thus boosting demand for transactional practice areas such as M&A, PE, and banking & finance. Other stories (arguably, such as the new Budget) will not have this kind of straightforward analysis easily available, and, as such, should you choose to discuss them, you will need to conduct more in-depth research.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 227096, member: 36777"] Hi [USER=40039]@panda1989[/USER] unfortunately I cannot give you very specific advice as to how to structure a written exercise, simply because the type of structure that works will depend a lot on the details of the exercise itself and the information you have to cover. Looking back at my written exercises, the only common features in terms of structure that I tended to observe were the following: [LIST=1] [*][B]An introductory executive summary heading with a short paragraph following it[/B], which explains the scope of my analysis, the core point of each section, and the main conclusion. [*][B]Having different big headings for different parts of the task[/B] (ie if an email I had to respond to asked me three different questions, I would separate my writing in three different sections) [*][B]Having headings/subheadings for core assessment criteria[/B]: as you are reading the relevant information, ask yourself what are the core cost/benefit factors you need to consider; sometimes, this provides you an easy way to present information and structure your analysis. [*][B]Sometimes, separating section by subheading such as "Brief Summary" and "Analysis" can make sense[/B], such as to clearly convey both what is uncontroversial factual information and what is your own viewpoint. [/LIST] As for impact of news stories, when reading about a story I think you should always be asking yourself "[I]how could this impact businesses[/I]?" and then "[I]how does this impact change what they want from their lawyers[/I]?". Some stories have very easy and direct answers to both: eg a lowering of interest rates reduces borrowing costs, which makes deal financing cheaper and reduces valuation gaps between buyers and sellers, thus boosting demand for transactional practice areas such as M&A, PE, and banking & finance. Other stories (arguably, such as the new Budget) will not have this kind of straightforward analysis easily available, and, as such, should you choose to discuss them, you will need to conduct more in-depth research. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…