TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="De novo" data-source="post: 232011" data-attributes="member: 43599">Some GPT notes I had on this if helpfulP.s. Londoners love Northern accents!<h3>What Received Pronunciation ("RP") used to signal</h3>Historically, RP functioned as a proxy for:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Education</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Social class</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Institutional authority</li> </ul>That linkage has materially weakened.<h3>What now signals professionalism</h3>Today, credibility is driven by:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Precision of language</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Logical structure</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Confidence and control</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Situational awareness</li> </ul>Accent ≠ competence.In many sectors, regional or international accents are now normalised, including:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Magic Circle / US law firms</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Big Four and mid-tier advisory</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In-house legal and tax teams</li> </ul><h2>The Actual Standard You’re Being Held To</h2>The real requirement is not RP, but intelligibility + control.You are expected to:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Be clearly understood by your audience</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Speak at a measured pace</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Use professional vocabulary and syntax</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Avoid slang, filler, or informal constructions</li> </ol>If those are met, accent is irrelevant.<h2>What You Do Need (and What You Don’t)</h2><h3>You do NOT need:</h3> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">RP vowel shaping</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Upper-middle-class intonation</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Accent suppression or mimicry</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A “BBC voice”</li> </ul>Trying to force RP often:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Sounds artificial</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Reduces fluency</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Undermines confidence</li> </ul><h3>You DO need:</h3> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Neutralised pronunciation of key technical words</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Controlled pace and emphasis</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clean sentence endings</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Reduced phonetic ambiguity</li> </ul><h2>Practical “Workaround”: Accent Neutralisation, Not Accent Erasure</h2>This is the professional solution used by many senior advisers.<h3>Prioritise Clarity over Accent</h3>Focus on:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Fully pronouncing consonants (especially word endings)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Avoiding dropped syllables in technical terms</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Separating words cleanly (no rushing)</li> </ul><h3>Control Pace and Pausing</h3>A slower pace:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Increases perceived authority</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Improves comprehension</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Reduces accent salience</li> </ul>Strategic pauses signal confidence, not hesitation.<h2>The Reality of Bias (and How to Handle It)</h2>It would be naïve to say accent bias does not exist. It can.However:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Bias attaches more to perceived uncertainty than accent itself</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Confidence + clarity neutralise most bias</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Overcompensating (forcing RP) often triggers bias</li> </ul>Senior professionals with strong regional accents succeed because:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They speak decisively</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They don’t apologise for their voice</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They command the subject matter</li> </ul><h2>A Useful Internal Rule</h2>A strong heuristic for professional speech:You do not need Received Pronunciation.You need:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clear speech</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Professional language</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Controlled delivery</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Confidence in content</li> </ul>Accent is part of identity. Professionalism is behavioural, not phonetic.<h3>What “accent salience” means</h3>Accent salience is how much the listener’s attention is drawn to your accent as a “feature” rather than to your message.If your accent is salient, the listener is more aware of:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Your pronunciation differences</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Your rhythm/intonation</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Your identity cues</li> </ul>If your accent is less salient, the listener is primarily aware of:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Your reasoning</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Your structure</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Your confidence</li> </ul>This does not mean your accent disappears. It means it stops being “foregrounded.”<h4>What increases accent salience</h4> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Rushing</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Mumbled endings</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Unstable volume</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Upspeak (rising tone at ends of statements)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Frequent fillers</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Over-correction (trying to “do RP” mid-sentence)</li> </ul><h4>What decreases accent salience</h4> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Pace control</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clear word boundaries</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clean sentence endings</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Structured speech</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Strong content vocabulary</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Calm, consistent tone</li> </ul>The counterintuitive piece: structure is one of the strongest accent-salience reducers because it gives the brain a predictable map.<h3>Why bias effects feel so powerful to the recipient (imposter syndrome, unconscious bias, etc.)</h3>This is a deep point. Bias is powerful not only because of the external behaviour, but because it interacts with the recipient’s internal threat systems and meaning-making.<h3>A. The brain treats social evaluation as a threat problem</h3>Humans are highly sensitive to:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">rejection</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">status loss</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">exclusion</li> </ul>These are processed by the nervous system as survival-relevant. So even subtle cues—tone, interruption, dismissiveness—can trigger a threat response (fight/flight/freeze), which in turn:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">speeds speech</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">reduces working memory</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">increases error rate</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">makes you second-guess</li> </ul>Then a vicious cycle can form:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">you sense bias or dismissal</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">your body activates threat state</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">your delivery becomes less controlled</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">the other person reads that as uncertainty</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">they become more dismissive</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">you conclude “I’m not good enough”</li> </ol>That is how external bias and internal imposter syndrome can reinforce each other.<h3>B. “Attributional ambiguity” is psychologically expensive</h3>When someone treats you dismissively, you often can’t tell:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Is it me?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Is it them?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Is it time pressure?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Is it bias?</li> </ul>That uncertainty is mentally draining. It leads to rumination and self-monitoring, which consumes cognitive resources you could otherwise use for performance.<h3>C. Identity threat amplifies perception and cost</h3>If you suspect a negative stereotype is in play (accent, ethnicity, background), you may experience:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">heightened self-consciousness</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">performance anxiety</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">over-monitoring of speech</li> </ul>This can reduce fluency even if your underlying capability is strong.So yes: the recipient impact is not “imagined.” It is a plausible interaction of (i) social threat response + (ii) uncertainty about cause + (iii) identity meaning.<h3>“Reduced phonetic ambiguity”: what it means, and before/after examples</h3>Phonetic ambiguity is when the sounds you produce could plausibly be interpreted as multiple different words or endings, especially in fast professional speech.In conversations - especially with people who are busy or distracted - listeners often:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">half-listen</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">look at their phone or screen</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">focus on the overall idea, not every word</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">make quick judgments about confidence</li> </ul>It’s not about accent “correctness.” It’s about preventing misunderstanding at speed.So if your word endings blur or your syllables collapse, the listener’s brain fills gaps with assumptions. That increases the probability you get misheard, interrupted, or asked to repeat yourself - which then makes you feel more anxious.Minimal daily practice (non-accent-changing) - expanded1. The “sentence landing” drill (2 minutes)What to do<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Read any paragraph aloud.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Put slight emphasis on the final word of each sentence.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Let your voice drop slightly at the end (not dramatically).</li> </ul>Why it helps<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Trailing off is often read as uncertainty.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Clean sentence endings signal confidence, even when content is cautious.</li> </ul>CheckAsk yourself: Did the sentence feel finished, or did it fade away?<h3></h3><h3></h3></blockquote>

Verification: Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Top Bottom

Search

Search

Reply to thread