Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Abbie Whitlock" data-source="post: 243696" data-attributes="member: 42112"><p>Hey!</p><p></p><p>That is an interesting take, but I don't think I agree with such a rigid viewpoint. In my view, a strong "why this firm" answer usually draws on 2-3 specific, well-developed reasons, rather than trying to write a few hundred words on one deal or transaction that the firm has completed recently.</p><p></p><p>Focusing on multiple aspects (such as a practice area that you are genuinely interested in, a particular pro bono initiative, and something like international secondment opportunities) helps show why this firm specifically has the right mix of factors motivating you. Simply saying that you are interested in PE, for instance, wouldn't necessarily explain why you are applying to Paul, Weiss rather than Ropes & Gray.</p><p></p><p>As long as each point is concrete and explained in some depth, I don't think discussing more than one area comes across as desperate at all. If anything, I'd say it shows you've thought carefully about where you'll fit best and that you have a good understanding of the firm <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Abbie Whitlock, post: 243696, member: 42112"] Hey! That is an interesting take, but I don't think I agree with such a rigid viewpoint. In my view, a strong "why this firm" answer usually draws on 2-3 specific, well-developed reasons, rather than trying to write a few hundred words on one deal or transaction that the firm has completed recently. Focusing on multiple aspects (such as a practice area that you are genuinely interested in, a particular pro bono initiative, and something like international secondment opportunities) helps show why this firm specifically has the right mix of factors motivating you. Simply saying that you are interested in PE, for instance, wouldn't necessarily explain why you are applying to Paul, Weiss rather than Ropes & Gray. As long as each point is concrete and explained in some depth, I don't think discussing more than one area comes across as desperate at all. If anything, I'd say it shows you've thought carefully about where you'll fit best and that you have a good understanding of the firm :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…