Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forum Home
Law Firms
Wiki
Events
Deadlines
Members
Leaderboards
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Premium Database
TCLA Premium:
Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Abbie Whitlock" data-source="post: 243708" data-attributes="member: 42112"><p>Hey!</p><p></p><p>For this type of written task, I would say that the focus should be on structure and prioritisation rather than perfect legal knowledge. Therefore, I'd focus on the following areas:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Start with a clear stance / position: </strong>state your conclusion or recommendation upfront so that the assessor knows exactly what you are arguing (almost like an executive summary)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Use a logical structure: </strong>there isn't necessarily a strict one you have to follow, but I would briefly set out the facts, identify the key issues, and then deal with each point in turn - just make sure to explain why each point supports your argument. It might help to utilise headings for your answer.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Be selective and prioritise: </strong>you might not have time to cover absolutely everything, so I would pick the strongest points and develop them properly, rather than listing lots of weaker ones in less depth.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Acknowledge counterarguments:</strong> as you would in a university essay, I would briefly acknowledge them to show judgment and balance, especially if you then explain why they don't outweigh your conclusion (i.e. why your argument is stronger)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><strong>Write clearly and commercially:</strong> you should aim to be concise and clear - try not to waffle (easier said than done, I know!) and try to keep the client's objectives in mind when you are answering.</li> </ol><p>It really helps to practice these sorts of exercises under time pressure - for instance, you could take a commercial article and summarise it into an argument in 30-45 minutes. This will help build your confidence for the real thing!</p><p></p><p>I hope that assists, and best of luck! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Abbie Whitlock, post: 243708, member: 42112"] Hey! For this type of written task, I would say that the focus should be on structure and prioritisation rather than perfect legal knowledge. Therefore, I'd focus on the following areas: [LIST=1] [*][B]Start with a clear stance / position: [/B]state your conclusion or recommendation upfront so that the assessor knows exactly what you are arguing (almost like an executive summary) [*][B]Use a logical structure: [/B]there isn't necessarily a strict one you have to follow, but I would briefly set out the facts, identify the key issues, and then deal with each point in turn - just make sure to explain why each point supports your argument. It might help to utilise headings for your answer. [*][B]Be selective and prioritise: [/B]you might not have time to cover absolutely everything, so I would pick the strongest points and develop them properly, rather than listing lots of weaker ones in less depth. [*][B]Acknowledge counterarguments:[/B] as you would in a university essay, I would briefly acknowledge them to show judgment and balance, especially if you then explain why they don't outweigh your conclusion (i.e. why your argument is stronger) [*][B]Write clearly and commercially:[/B] you should aim to be concise and clear - try not to waffle (easier said than done, I know!) and try to keep the client's objectives in mind when you are answering. [/LIST] It really helps to practice these sorts of exercises under time pressure - for instance, you could take a commercial article and summarise it into an argument in 30-45 minutes. This will help build your confidence for the real thing! I hope that assists, and best of luck! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forum Home
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2025-26
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
