TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
Join →

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CharlesT47" data-source="post: 245180" data-attributes="member: 41021">Hi, can someone help explain how arbitration differs across firms? I understand that Debevoise is extremely renowned for arbitration and they do their advocacy in-house, meaning that there are solicitor-advocates within the firm who do the advocacy.I then have 2 questions:First, is this in-house advocacy style unique to arbitration powerhouses like Debevoise or Skadden? Do firms that are lower ranked operate in the more traditional way in litigation which involves the solicitors firm seeking out barristers? Essentially, I hope to understand whether this is a unique selling point for Debevoise. Second, for firms that do their advocacy in-house, how does this materially affect the work of a trainee solicitor in an arbitration seat? Does this mean they help draft oral submissions? Does this mean a trainee might have a more unique insight into the advocacy side that is more typical for a barrister to take on?</blockquote>

Verification: Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Top Bottom